kfay Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 Just kibbitzed this hand. What do you open with ♠AK1043♥AKJ♦AK763♣ IMPs all white. World Class partner and opps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcLight Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 Whats wrong with 2♣? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TylerE Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 If I was feeling really sick, Pass, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inquiry Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 I open 3♦.. either a heart preempt, or a strong two suiter with diamonds and one of the black suits. After partner makes his bid, I can then show a spade/diamond two suiter with 3 losers (the honest response) or with 2 losers needing no cover card in clubs (almost true). Anyway, I will end up in at least 4♦ no matter what... somehow this will at least avoid the world record... :lol: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jlall Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 umm...2C??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pclayton Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 2C. Seems I wont have much of a rebid problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kfay Posted May 30, 2008 Author Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 Don't imagine I'll get many more responses. Harmon Edgar opened 1♠ with this hand, which was passed out. 1♠+6 I don't mean to call attention to what I thought was a terrible bid by a player who I obviously respect. I just thought this was taking an idea way too far. Was wondering if anyone shared his philosophy about strong 2-suiters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inquiry Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 Strong two suiters are frequently opened one of a suit, becauae of the difficulty of dealing iwth the loss of bidding space if you open 2C. This is one reason I play misiry (outlined in my first post). However, without misiry, some strong two suited hands are just too darn strong to risk a one of a suit bid. This is one of those hands even for those who believe in opening in one of a suit with a stong hand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neilkaz Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 With a very control rich 22 HCP the chances of passout are too much for 1♠, I'd instantly open 2♣ without the J of ♥. Those that play Bergen (or other preemptive 3♠) have chances to be saved here as perhaps PD has junk with 4♠ and can bid 3. Those that play 1NTF and constructive raises may be saved if PD has 3 trumps and 4 or a bad 5 hcp and starts with the forcing NT, which the intention of signing off in 2♠ hoping to steal the hand. However, those are too many BIG if's for me to not open 2♣ instantly. Passed out with a slam is a good possibility, and especially vs opps, that need something to balance and force to the 2 level. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rogerclee Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 World record in terms of playing strength? I think that ♠AQ ♥AKQTxxxxx ♦A ♣A hand from a team match I played in awhile ago is still the winner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 Strong two suiters are frequently opened one of a suit, becauae of the difficulty of dealing iwth the loss of bidding space if you open 2C. This is one reason I play misiry (outlined in my first post). However, without misiry, some strong two suited hands are just too darn strong to risk a one of a suit bid. This is one of those hands even for those who believe in opening in one of a suit with a stong hand. What auction would lead to that difficulty on this hand? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimG Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 1♠+6 I think he meant world record for over tricks, unless that '+6" means making six instead of six over tricks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackshoe Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 The correct answer to the original question is "it depends what system I'm playing." :lol: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike777 Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 Just kibbitzed this hand. What do you open with ♠AK1043♥AKJ♦AK763♣ IMPs all white. World Class partner and opps. seriously.........i open 2c wtp.....too much only 3 losers.the rest of the hand maybe but 2c=100% with any wc partner I play with. If wc partner prefers i open one spade...npp....just tell me so I can file it.. ty.....lol I only wish..wish this is the worst bid or play I ever make with a wc pard....:) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
655321 Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 hands like these are why I freed up a 2♣ opening in my system for game forcing hands. :) But, I wouldn't worry too much about seeing somebody experiment with a 1♠ opening in a friendly online game - if you can't try stuff under those conditions, when can you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 2♣ wtp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 Don't imagine I'll get many more responses. Harmon Edgar opened 1♠ with this hand, which was passed out. 1♠+6 I don't mean to call attention to what I thought was a terrible bid by a player who I obviously respect. I just thought this was taking an idea way too far. Was wondering if anyone shared his philosophy about strong 2-suiters. was he playing 2/1 with forcing 1NT and constructiveraises? If he did, the bid is not completly out of this world,because partner will bid, if he holds 4HCP and a spadefit, but it is risky. With kind regadsMarlowe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finch Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 I open a lot of these hands at the 1-level.I'm slowly being trained out of it after scoring 1C+5, but without that how could I have had the amusement on another hand of being protected out of 1D into a making slam? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 lots of 2m+5 (13 tricks, sigh) in lower level play. and 1NT+6 does happen sometimes. I don't like passing 1M with a sexy 3 or 4 count particularly NV. That said, this does (barely) look like a bit thick for 1♠. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barmar Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 While two-suiters can often be difficult to bid after a 2♣ opening, this particular combination of suits doesn't look like it will have rebid problems to show both suits. The only potential problem is if the pesky opponents stick in a ♣ preempt, but you can deal with this with a NT rebidt showing a 2-suiter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inquiry Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 Strong two suiters are frequently opened one of a suit, becauae of the difficulty of dealing iwth the loss of bidding space if you open 2C. This is one reason I play misiry (outlined in my first post). However, without misiry, some strong two suited hands are just too darn strong to risk a one of a suit bid. This is one of those hands even for those who believe in opening in one of a suit with a stong hand. What auction would lead to that difficulty on this hand? None.. .2♣=2♦2♠=3♠ (or second neg then raise spades)6♠ (or some forcing bid to get to it) This hand works fine on 2♣ bid.... not all strong two suiters do, however. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgeac Posted May 31, 2008 Report Share Posted May 31, 2008 do u remember what his partner had? was that an obvious pass over 1♠, just curious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
babalu1997 Posted May 31, 2008 Report Share Posted May 31, 2008 Don't imagine I'll get many more responses. Harmon Edgar opened 1♠ with this hand, which was passed out. 1♠+6 I don't mean to call attention to what I thought was a terrible bid by a player who I obviously respect. I just thought this was taking an idea way too far. Was wondering if anyone shared his philosophy about strong 2-suiters. yeah i open that hand 1 spade and know a few people who do. i stray a little bit and open 2 clubs to rebid 2nt if the hand is balanced and stopped. i am glad to find out there are wc players who actually bid like that. i always thought max hardy was exaggerating to propose that in his book. and yes it hurts to play 1 sapdes when everyone else is in 4s Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neilkaz Posted May 31, 2008 Report Share Posted May 31, 2008 do u remember what his partner had? was that an obvious pass over 1♠, just curious. I'd like to also see it ! In reply to babalu...it hurts lots worse to be passed out at the 1 level in a slam ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kfay Posted June 1, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 Don't imagine I'll get many more responses. Harmon Edgar opened 1♠ with this hand, which was passed out. 1♠+6 I don't mean to call attention to what I thought was a terrible bid by a player who I obviously respect. I just thought this was taking an idea way too far. Was wondering if anyone shared his philosophy about strong 2-suiters. yeah i open that hand 1 spade and know a few people who do. i stray a little bit and open 2 clubs to rebid 2nt if the hand is balanced and stopped. i am glad to find out there are wc players who actually bid like that. i always thought max hardy was exaggerating to propose that in his book. and yes it hurts to play 1 sapdes when everyone else is in 4s Actually everyone else is in 6♠. I think this happens to be quite a good argument against it. Seriously if you think this is an argument for why 1♠ is the correct opening I don't think you've understood this thread at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.