cnszsun Posted March 20, 2004 Report Share Posted March 20, 2004 I have read Stephen Levy's artilce "What the Pros Play".This is quoted from his article:"I once asked Barry Crane to give me one good tip in bridge. He told me, Never open 1NT with 4-4 in the majors. We do not open 1NT with two 4-card majors."Do you agree with him and why? Do you know what's the reason behind his suggestion? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trpltrbl Posted March 20, 2004 Report Share Posted March 20, 2004 Personally I don't agree, but it must have worked for him, since he won a lot.I like to describe my hand as quick and easy as possible. But I won't never ever open 1 NT with 5-4 in majors. Mike :rolleyes: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted March 20, 2004 Report Share Posted March 20, 2004 I also disagree, but it has some logic. 1NT is used as some sort of preemptive weapon. If you have both mastersuits, you don't need to lose the entire 1-level. But when playing 5 card Majors, you're still not showing your real suit... Also, you get rebid problems imo, to show your exact HCP range. I'll still open 1NT with 4-4M... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bearmum Posted March 20, 2004 Report Share Posted March 20, 2004 Guess it depends on what system u play ( AND what version of what system :rolleyes: )My reg P in f2f and I play ONE version of Precision and 1NT is 13-15 BUT NEVER two 4 C majors Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inquiry Posted April 6, 2004 Report Share Posted April 6, 2004 Barry Crane was the ulitimate matchpoint player. His advice, I think would be better geared for a matchpoint game. In fact, correct me if I am wrong, but Matchpoint precision had the same "rule" about not opening 1NT with 4-4 in the majors, and explained it along the lines of the bad result you will get at your table using weak notrump if bidding went 1NT-all pass, while at the other tables the weak notrump hand opened a minor and their partner responded a major.... since you safely play two of the major in 4-4 fit whch is likely to take at least one extra trick. Ben Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tysen2k Posted April 6, 2004 Report Share Posted April 6, 2004 In my homegrown system for matchpoints I play 1N never has a 4cM. I also extend the range to 11-15, using 2♣ as a strength ask. At matchpoints, missing the 2M partial costs a lot more than at IMPs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bearmum Posted April 6, 2004 Report Share Posted April 6, 2004 Barry Crane was the ulitimate matchpoint player. His advice, I think would be better geared for a matchpoint game. In fact, correct me if I am wrong, but Matchpoint precision had the same "rule" about not opening 1NT with 4-4 in the majors, and explained it along the lines of the bad result you will get at your table using weak notrump if bidding went 1NT-all pass, while at the other tables the weak notrump hand opened a minor and their partner responded a major.... since you safely play two of the major in 4-4 fit whch is likely to take at least one extra trick. Ben Think you are right about Matchpoint Precision Ben ( but since I have not yet found the book sonce we moved) I couldn't look it up :( but we play it at ALL times Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulg Posted April 7, 2004 Report Share Posted April 7, 2004 Barry Crane was the ulitimate matchpoint player. His advice, I think would be better geared for a matchpoint game. In fact, correct me if I am wrong, but Matchpoint precision had the same "rule" about not opening 1NT with 4-4 in the majors, and explained it along the lines of the bad result you will get at your table using weak notrump if bidding went 1NT-all pass, while at the other tables the weak notrump hand opened a minor and their partner responded a major.... since you safely play two of the major in 4-4 fit whch is likely to take at least one extra trick. BenI think Ben is right too. However if you adopt this policy then you also have to consider the consequences. If the auction now goes 1♦-1NT do you raise with 16 points? This will get you a level higher than most of the field who will bid 1NT-Pass. Also it means more work on the 1♦-2♣/♦ sequences as you can hold any balanced hand in the 12-19 point range. Personally I advocate that balanced hands should open, or rebid, NT. Paul Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luke warm Posted April 7, 2004 Report Share Posted April 7, 2004 playing a weak nt where a 1nt rebid shows 14-16(17), i'd still open this with my better minor... if pard shows a major, i can raise.. if it goes 1D/2C, i just bid 2H (not a reverse)... this is at matchpoints, i might open 1nt at imps Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted April 8, 2004 Report Share Posted April 8, 2004 I used to play 1NT as 15+1/2 - 17+1/2 range, meaning with both 15 and 18 you have to pick your opening, playing there I made good results opening every 4 card major with 15 or 18 with 1 minor. Never tried it with 16/17 because my partner is suposed to expect unbalanced after a level 3 raise in a major so I cannot argue there. Now I play 15-17 as most strong NT pairs do, and I often still devaluate my 15 with 4-4 in majors, still getting good results. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.