han Posted May 24, 2008 Report Share Posted May 24, 2008 Team game. 9865K1075A10875 (p) - 1NT - (2S) - ?? You play penalty doubles, 1NT showed 15-17, 2S is natural. What's your call? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted May 24, 2008 Report Share Posted May 24, 2008 Hi, it is either pass or X, ... depending on mood I woulddouble, but it would be a terrible bid. With kind regardsMarlowe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimG Posted May 24, 2008 Report Share Posted May 24, 2008 Pass. Game for our side is remote, especially now that the opponents have laid claim to the spade suit. Any plus score should be fine. The opponents likely have a better fit in hearts and a double might make it easier for them to get there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcLight Posted May 24, 2008 Report Share Posted May 24, 2008 I think the downside (doubling into game) is too great. Its less tahn 50%, but its not miniscule. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted May 24, 2008 Report Share Posted May 24, 2008 You really have to know your opponent for problems like this, against a random one I guess I pass but there are ones where I would double all day. The vul too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han Posted May 24, 2008 Author Report Share Posted May 24, 2008 Good point, everybody was vulnerable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pclayton Posted May 24, 2008 Report Share Posted May 24, 2008 I think doubling is very poor. RHO have should 6S and pard's Hx is poorly placed. One of our defensive assets (HK) is a precarious singleton. Its very easy to envision 8 tricks here. If we beat it I will mentally thank RHO for taking us out of 1N with his source of tricks and probable entry. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy_h Posted May 25, 2008 Report Share Posted May 25, 2008 Pass. 9865 isn't that great and it's imps and we might even struggle to get our first 6 tricks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted May 25, 2008 Report Share Posted May 25, 2008 Obvious 2NT lebenshol, wtp??? Odds are huge that pard has 3 clubs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han Posted May 25, 2008 Author Report Share Posted May 25, 2008 This hand came up today at the United States Women trials. There was no double at either table. One of the commentators pointed out that that meant that both pairs must be playing negative doubles, but for hands like this you'd wish you were playing penalty doubles. I didn't think it was so clear. It is possible that the commentator was influenced by the fact that 2S went down 1 and down 2 at the table. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jlall Posted May 25, 2008 Report Share Posted May 25, 2008 I'd pass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkDean Posted May 28, 2008 Report Share Posted May 28, 2008 I would double. Maybe thiat is why all of my partners like to play negative doubles here...Maybe I am influenced by the crap I overcall 2S on as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArtK78 Posted May 28, 2008 Report Share Posted May 28, 2008 I hope the commentator was joking. Doubling is OK at matchpoints but the risks at IMPs far outweigh the rewards. If I had to guess at a result of the hand, I would guess down one at 2S. So doubling isn't going to show much of a profit. Only if you can beat it 2 or more is doubling profitable. But if it makes, the double would be a disaster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benlessard Posted May 29, 2008 Report Share Posted May 29, 2008 wtp pass for me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skjaeran Posted May 29, 2008 Report Share Posted May 29, 2008 Double would't enter my mind here, other calls might. Pass seems sensible though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apollo81 Posted May 29, 2008 Report Share Posted May 29, 2008 I'd pass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neilkaz Posted May 29, 2008 Report Share Posted May 29, 2008 I saw the hand as it was played. I wouldn't go head hunting at IMPs with 4 weak trumps. Needing a swing at MP I'll X and lead my stiff K of ♥. 2NT leb to 3♣ is possible as opener almost certainly has 3+♣, but I think passing it around to him is a little better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barryallen Posted June 3, 2008 Report Share Posted June 3, 2008 Obvious 2NT lebenshol, wtp??? Odds are huge that pard has 3 clubs. To Leb or not to Leb? You know you have no chance of bumping them into 3♠ so that extra is out. It also looks favourable that you will end up with a positive score either in 2♠ by them or 3♣ by yourself? But I would not take the risk and just pass. To double here just is asking to get kicked around the table by your team mates in the post match. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeh Posted June 3, 2008 Report Share Posted June 3, 2008 I don't know, and don't want to know, who the commentator was. But, some commentators are relatively weak and prone to 'analyzing' based on seeing all the hands. Other commentators feel pressure to say something, and so type a comment without thinking it through and others exhibit elements of both weaknesses .. btw, I include myself in that category lest anyone think that I am being overly harsh on whoever made the comment in this case. As it is, double seems to me to be borderline insane. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jlall Posted June 3, 2008 Report Share Posted June 3, 2008 All, You have SEVEN points, and FOUR spades. Even if partner has minimum holdings in both, combined you have TWENTY TWO points and SIX spades, and could have more! Not just that, but you have an ace and a king. These are quicktricks, and undervalued by the point system! So it is basically impossible for them to make with so few HCP AND spades AND quick tricks, making this a clear double. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han Posted June 4, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 Hehe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
655321 Posted June 4, 2008 Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 I didn't get it (Being Foo perhaps?) Never mind, if it was someone more current, I probably don't need to know - enough flame wars for the time being :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jlall Posted June 4, 2008 Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 I didn't get it (Being Foo perhaps?) Never mind, if it was someone more current, I probably don't need to know - enough flame wars for the time being :) Was just a joke, not on anyone in particular Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barryallen Posted June 6, 2008 Report Share Posted June 6, 2008 I don't know, and don't want to know, who the commentator was. But, some commentators are relatively weak and prone to 'analyzing' based on seeing all the hands. Other commentators feel pressure to say something, and so type a comment without thinking it through and others exhibit elements of both weaknesses .. btw, I include myself in that category lest anyone think that I am being overly harsh on whoever made the comment in this case. As it is, double seems to me to be borderline insane. So very true. Competent players turn into blithering idiots when put into the commentary position. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pclayton Posted June 6, 2008 Report Share Posted June 6, 2008 I don't know, and don't want to know, who the commentator was. But, some commentators are relatively weak and prone to 'analyzing' based on seeing all the hands. Other commentators feel pressure to say something, and so type a comment without thinking it through and others exhibit elements of both weaknesses .. btw, I include myself in that category lest anyone think that I am being overly harsh on whoever made the comment in this case. As it is, double seems to me to be borderline insane. So very true. Competent players turn into blithering idiots when put into the commentary position. Commentating can be like playing. If you are fresh, then you can spot things fairly easy, and stay objective about what only the player can see from his POV. If you are tired, its really easy to make errors, since you miss key points, or don't see a bid, or whatever. For me, I also get a little tense when I'm commentating with someone, really, really good, but theres only one or two players I get uncomfortable with. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.