Jump to content

European Team championships


Gerben42

Who is going to win?  

104 members have voted

  1. 1. Who is going to win?

    • France
      0
    • Iceland
      1
    • Ireland
      4
    • Italy
      44
    • Netherlands
      12
    • Norway
      17
    • Poland
      8
    • Russia
      3
    • Sweden
      9
    • none of the above
      6


Recommended Posts

Something that I found suprising, make that

astonishing, was that undo is permitted not only

on bidding but on play. I had always thought

that if a card hit the table then it could not be

taken back. I think it should be so: if you make

a mistake you should pay for it.

 

Maybe I am missing something, but I see no

difference between undoing bid and play in bridge

and undoing a home run pitch in baseball.

What you're probably missing is that the bids and plays are entered by an operator. A lot of the undos are as a result of the operator making a mistake in copying what actually happened at the table.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 119
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Something that I found suprising, make that

astonishing, was that undo is permitted not only

on bidding but on play. I had always thought

that if a card hit the table then it could not be

taken back. I think it should be so: if you make

a mistake you should pay for it.

 

Maybe I am missing something, but I see no

difference between undoing bid and play in bridge

and undoing a home run pitch in baseball.

What you're probably missing is that the bids and plays are entered by an operator. A lot of the undos are as a result of the operator making a mistake in copying what actually happened at the table.

Which is very easy to do, especially with the Italians who tend to show their cards for a microsecond, then claim and everyone puts their cards away.

 

Also it is warm here so sticky keys on the laptops are troublesome.

 

p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...ITALY?

 

Angelini - Bocchi - Duboin -  Lauria -  Sementa -  Versace

 

What the... Benching the best pair B)

...

Sementa-Angelini in Pau - Butler of -.69 IMPs before being benched. Fantoni-Nunes Butler in Shanghai +.84 (1st) in the round robin

 

Sources:

Pau: After 19 Butler (see just after Pizza of San Marino)

 

Shanghai Bulletin 9 (see page 18)

 

Edit: Sementa-Angelini now unbenched to play against Iceland

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice to have 3 pairs of the same strength...

 

BRINK Sjoert DRIJVER Bas +0.60

WESTRA Berry RAMONDT Vincent +0.60

BERTENS Huub BAKKEREN Ton +0.53

They may have played against different opponents, butler only says so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...ITALY?

 

Angelini - Bocchi - Duboin -  Lauria -  Sementa -  Versace

 

What the... Benching the best pair :(

...

Sementa-Angelini in Pau - Butler of -.69 IMPs before being benched. Fantoni-Nunes Butler in Shanghai +.84 (1st) in the round robin

 

Sources:

Pau: After 19 Butler (see just after Pizza of San Marino)

Sorry, this is just TOO funny...

Especially after reading comments about sponsors

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rumors here in Germany say that they are much better if the tournement is just for a weekend like the Champions Cup and worse in a long event.

We will wait and see and hope. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jlall
Nice to have 3 pairs of the same strength...

 

BRINK Sjoert DRIJVER Bas +0.60

WESTRA Berry RAMONDT Vincent +0.60

BERTENS Huub BAKKEREN Ton +0.53

They may have played against different opponents, butler only says so much.

Yes, it amazes me how much faith people put into the butler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jlall
Yes, it amazes me how much faith people put into the butler.

and what stat by pair would you suggest they put their faith in then?

I think trying to use stats for things they cannot be used for is stupid. If you were to say to me:

 

One pair had a butler of +1, the other of -1, over hundreds of boards. I would say it is safe to draw the conclusion that the +1 pair is playing better than the -1 pair.

 

If you were to say to me 3 pairs had butlers within .1 imp of each other over a couple of hundred boards, I would say that saying those pairs are all playing roughly equally well is dumb.

 

Some pairs play mainly against weak pairs strategically (perhaps they have a more active style, or stranger methods). This favors that pair.

 

Often the weakest pair on a team will be in against the weaker teams while the strongest pair takes a breather. This hurts the strongest pair on the teams butler a lot, and helps the weaker pairs butler.

 

In imps, since a few boards have a large weight on the overall butler score, sometimes you can get killed on the slam hands just because of luck. This can severely hurt your butler.

 

So I totally favor drawing reasonable conclusions from the butler, but people consistently draw unreasonable conclusions from them. Drawing unreasonable conclusions is worse than drawing no conclusions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think butlers are very useful as a long term guide.

 

If a pair does well on butlers in one event it may not mean a lot - they may have played weaker pairs, got lucky on slams, etc. But if a pair consistently does well on butlers, it is pretty safe to assume they are playing well. And, equally, if a pair has one event where they are average on butlers it may not mean much. But if a pair is consistently average-poor on butlers it means a lot.

 

Sure, possibly people should have some idea if they are playing well or not, without the aid of butler scores. But IMO an objective measure is more, um, objective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now to confuse the Butlers we have the partnership of Versace-Sementa playing Holland (no, not the Netherlands, but the English partnership of Holland-Armstrong).
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, it amazes me how much faith people put into the butler.

and what stat by pair would you suggest they put their faith in then?

I think trying to use stats for things they cannot be used for is stupid. If you were to say to me:

 

One pair had a butler of +1, the other of -1, over hundreds of boards. I would say it is safe to draw the conclusion that the +1 pair is playing better than the -1 pair.

 

If you were to say to me 3 pairs had butlers within .1 imp of each other over a couple of hundred boards, I would say that saying those pairs are all playing roughly equally well is dumb.

 

Some pairs play mainly against weak pairs strategically (perhaps they have a more active style, or stranger methods). This favors that pair.

 

Often the weakest pair on a team will be in against the weaker teams while the strongest pair takes a breather. This hurts the strongest pair on the teams butler a lot, and helps the weaker pairs butler.

Dont think many teams make the lineup

after looking at opps lineup.

 

(Can be between teams that often meet,

like USA-Itay or Italy-Norway)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dont think many teams make the lineup

after looking at opps lineup.

 

(Can be between teams that often meet,

like USA-Itay or Italy-Norway)

In Pau we have blind lineup, just as in the Bermuda Bowl.

 

Curiously the butler from the final rounds have not yet been published. Perhaps it's better this way ;).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...