catch22 Posted April 13, 2008 Report Share Posted April 13, 2008 [hv=d=s&v=b&n=sa2haj65d93caj932&e=sq43h973dj762cq64]266|200|Scoring: IMP[/hv] (P)-1S-(P)-2S(P)-P-(X)-P(3H)-P-(4H)-P(P)-P 3H - Hearts non-minimum. You are playing 4 card majors 12-14 NTPartner leads the 6♠, declarer plays 2 from dummy and you Q holds. What now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted April 13, 2008 Report Share Posted April 13, 2008 diamond swich seems obvious, I wouldn't think more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hatchett Posted April 15, 2008 Report Share Posted April 15, 2008 Pretty hard to think of hand where it matters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeh Posted April 15, 2008 Report Share Posted April 15, 2008 [hv=n=sa2haj65d93caj932&w=sk10865hk2da854ck5&e=sq43h973dj762cq64&s=sj97hq1084dkq10c1087]399|300|win the spade and lead a club. If declarer wins, he can't get to hand to take the heart finesse.. and if he plays 2 rounds of hearts to stop the ruff, he is down on power. So he ducks and now partner continues clubs and declarer has nowhere to put his 2nd club loser. This is not unreasonable, altho it also isn't unreasonable to hope for 2 diamond tricks and a slow club winner[/hv] Let me add a minor rant: at the table, we'd know what card declarer played to trick one, we'd know our spot card lead agreements, and we'd know the constraints on our 1N opening bids... will we do it with 5233 but not 5242, etc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.