Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Our trick taking potential in NT really isn't that great, and we have excellent defense. If we pass there is a good chance that partner can reopen and that playing for a penalty is best. Still, it's red against white so I'll bid 2NT.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we have to bid 2NT, its very very risky (your idiot isn't totally insane) but partner could just have Kxxxxx of clubs to make 3NT on a spade lead. Not that he would bid it, but just to show that the right nothing could make it easy.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

♠K8xx ♥Axx ♦Ax ♣Axxx

 

(2♠)-??

 

Look at all those pretty controls. Close enough to a 16 count for me. 2N.

 

Will it always work out? No. Will you get tagged every now and then? Yes.

 

But you are going to miss a lot of games if you pass hands like this after a Weak Two. We rate to own the hand and GOP could easily have what you need to bring 3N or 4M home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2NT for me.

 

I did a quick simulation for this one too.

 

Double dummy we were 48% for 9+ tricks in NTs opposite a random hand from partner without five hearts. A further 19% of the time we could make 8 tricks. 17% of the time were were down two or more so there is a danger of getting doubled.

 

With five hearts we were 59% for 10+ tricks in hearts. Only 5% of the time were we down two or more in 3.

 

These numbers strongly suggest bidding especially the good results when we can find a heart fit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I am going against the majority. Pass for me. This hand has no intermediates and no source of tricks. Sure it has excellent controls but from where are the tricks going to come? Wayne's simulations are a fata morgana. On hands where we have something, partner will have a balancing bid, and then we have an easy game bid.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jlall
These numbers strongly suggest bidding especially the good results when we can find a heart fit.

Why? These numbers are meaningless without numbers on how often we are shut out when we pass. What if 100 % of the hands where we make game partner is reopening, and when we can't make anything partner is passing? Obviously artificial premises, but hopefully you see my point. I think much more important are the numbers of how we do on hands where partner is passing out 2S.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These numbers strongly suggest bidding especially the good results when we can find a heart fit.

Why? These numbers are meaningless without numbers on how often we are shut out when we pass. What if 100 % of the hands where we make game partner is reopening, and when we can't make anything partner is passing? Obviously artificial premises, but hopefully you see my point. I think much more important are the numbers of how we do on hands where partner is passing out 2S.

Yes I understand the point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These numbers strongly suggest bidding especially the good results when we can find a heart fit.

Why? These numbers are meaningless without numbers on how often we are shut out when we pass. What if 100 % of the hands where we make game partner is reopening, and when we can't make anything partner is passing? Obviously artificial premises, but hopefully you see my point. I think much more important are the numbers of how we do on hands where partner is passing out 2S.

I thought that was what I said!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2NT

I hope these x's are not all smaller then 8. If they are really all 2, 3 and 4's then I pass...maybe

?? they are all smaller than the 8 spot. if they hadn't been smaller than the 8, they would have been in front of the 8 no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2NT

I hope these x's are not all smaller then 8. If they are really all 2, 3 and 4's then I pass...maybe

?? they are all smaller than the 8 spot. if they hadn't been smaller than the 8, they would have been in front of the 8 no?

I meant all x's. I would be more happy with eg AT86 then with A432

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2NT

I hope these x's are not all smaller then 8. If they are really all 2, 3 and 4's then I pass...maybe

?? they are all smaller than the 8 spot. if they hadn't been smaller than the 8, they would have been in front of the 8 no?

I meant all x's. I would be more happy with eg AT86 then with A432

YES CSABA, ARE YOU SURE THE CLUBS AREN'T AT98?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...