civill Posted March 14, 2008 Report Share Posted March 14, 2008 836/683KCasking without interference(836/683KC3/0/1/5)Aces plus King of Trumps are key cards[...4nt]?5C :0/3 key cards5D :1/55H :2/4 with the trump queen5S :2/4 without the trump queen(836/683KC3015241240) The first two responses may be reversed (playing 836/683KC5130).5 NT does not necessarily ask for kings. The next 2 steps (other than trump suit) ask for kings or the queen. That is:I,over 5 C:5 D/H asks for trump Q5 H/S asks for kings II,over 5 D:5 H/S asks for trump Q5 S/NT asks for kings III,over 5 H if:Clubs, Diamonds, or Hearts are trump:5 S asks for kingsSpades are trump:5 NT asks for kings IV,over 5 S:5 NT asks for kings... 836/683KeyCard KickbackInstead of bidding 4nt to request key cards (see 836/683KCasking for key card combinations), responder bids thecheapest suit above the agreed suit. Thus, 4D is Kcasking for clubs4H is Kcaking for diamonds4S is Kcasking for hearts4nt is Kcasking for spades. Answer after interferenceXOPYX:Double;Redouble;O:0 or odd;P:pass;Y:I/E-1 or even;More combinations available but need written announcements between partnership in advance. Original Webpage & more... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted March 14, 2008 Report Share Posted March 14, 2008 What's the point in playing 1/5 when 5 never comes up? And what if you have ambiguity after 2 or 4 keycards (I know from experience with Turbo this can actually be a huge problem)? This sucks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
civill Posted March 15, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 15, 2008 While you bid the asking,you're impossible to known how many HCPs/KCs in the PD's hand;But you could know whether the PD's stonger or weaker; Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
civill Posted March 15, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 15, 2008 It's seldom that 5-KC will come, but 5 might be change to 1 KC with 4 secondary KCs,such as trump Queen/suit Kings.How about the modification? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillHiggin Posted March 15, 2008 Report Share Posted March 15, 2008 If you are worried about the 5 key card problem (the rest of us are not), then just think of the last two steps as 2/5 without Q and 2/5 with Q. Of course, it will always be 2 and never 5, but at least everything else is undamaged. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomi2 Posted March 15, 2008 Report Share Posted March 15, 2008 what aout this: say 4NT is RKC for spades then: 1st step (5♣) = 2 Keycards or 0 Keycards w/o ♠Q or 4KC with ♠Qnext step then asks for ♠Q if you assume 2, else for kings2nd step asks for kings if you assume 2KC in partners hand but dont need to know ♠Q 2nd step (5♦) = 1KC with ♠Q or 3w/o♠Q or 5 with ♠Qnext step asks for kings 3rd step (5♥) = 1KC w/o ♠Q or 3with ♠Q or 5 w/o ♠Qnest step (5NT) asks for kings 4th step (5♠) = 0KC with♠Q or 4 w/o ♠Qnest step (5NT) asks for kings if you had a precise bidding before asking you will be able to read partners answer, else you count your own KCs like in normal 14-30 and try to figure it out, and if this doesnt help (then btw you wouldnt be able to reat answers like 1 or 4 as well) you have a 50% chance to have the ♠Q in your hand and will be surre what partner has. So you will get Keycards AND ♠Q on a low level and can start to ask for kings maybe before 5 of your suit of course you can (must) combine this sheme with kickback or something similar to avoid getting overboard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
civill Posted March 17, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 Now,I could give you an all-in-1 resolution here: ***********************************************II,8x6/68x KC asking wo/wt interference strength(0/1/2/3) answer:5♣ :<=strength key cards &, <=strength secondary KCs;5♦ :<=strength KCs but, >strength secondary KCs;5♥ :>strength KCs but, <=strength secondary KCs;5♠ :>strength KCs &, >strength secondary KCs; strongth define:0:to weak responser;1:to common;2:to positive;3:to strong; U could call it as 8x6/68x KC2bid. *********************************************** Else(further asking) maybe same as the top post; Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.