Jump to content

Simulation request


Recommended Posts

Hi. If someone could help me with a simple thing, I'd appreciate.

 

I'm devising a system where the 1 opener is either natural or a strong hand. I'd like to know the odds of 1 being strong in the following circumstances:

 

A. 1 = ...

a1. natural, 11-20

a2. any balanced 12-14

a3. strong, 18+ if 1-suited (6 cards), 20+ if balanced (5M possible), 21+ if 2/3 suited (54 or 4441)

 

B. 1 = ...

b1. natural, 11-20

b2. strong, 18+ if 1-suited (6 cards), 20+ if balanced (5M possible), 21+ if 2/3 suited (54 or 4441)

 

C. 1 = ...

c1. natural, 11-20 (cannot be balanced 18-19)

c2. any balanced 12-14

c3. strong, 21+ if 1-suited (6 cards), 20+ if balanced (5M possible), 21+ if 2/3 suited (54 or 4441)

 

D. 1 = ...

d1. natural, 11-20 (cannot be balanced 18-19)

d2. strong, 21+ if 1-suited (6 cards), 20+ if balanced (5M possible), 21+ if 2/3 suited (54 or 4441)

 

Difference between A/B and C/D is the strong variant being stronger in C/D and 18-19 bal not possibe.

 

Thx in advance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Allright. I've manage to get Han's program to work under windows. But the only thing it does is to generate hands. It doesn't do the statistics I wanted.

 

Is this a bug, a feature or should I just RTFM?

It will do the statistics you want. And, as I recall, it doesn't take much reading to figure out how to instruct it to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Allright. I've manage to get Han's program to work under windows. But the only thing it does is to generate hands. It doesn't do the statistics I wanted.

 

Is this a bug, a feature or should I just RTFM?

RTFM

 

I can be a malicious SOB, but I'm not the sort who would go out of my way to recommend a software package thats not suitable for you requirements

 

Take a look at the descr.6c example....

 

This should give you enough information to use the average function.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, we're talking about the same thing. It's been a while since I've used dealer, but you need to do something like this:

 

1c_natural=[insert conditions]

1c_strong=[insert conditions]

1c_open=1c_natural || 1c_strong

 

condition 1c_open

produce x [where x equals number of matching deals]

 

average "1C is strong" (1c_strong) [1c_strong should be "1" when the condition is met]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

boy, you guys are cryptic.. lol

 

Finally, it turned out that Hans has 2 dealers: BIGDEAL and DEALER. Bigdeal is windows and meant for tournament hand generation, while dealer is linux based and for bidding practice. What I downloaded was bigdeal, which, of course, doesn't do statistics. Got dealer now and gonna check it out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

boy, you guys are cryptic.. lol

 

Finally, it turned out that Hans has 2 dealers: BIGDEAL and DEALER. Bigdeal is windows and meant for tournament hand generation, while dealer is linux based and for bidding practice. What I downloaded was bigdeal, which, of course, doesn't do statistics. Got dealer now and gonna check it out.

I went looking today and could not find a download site. Can you point to a specific directory?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, I don't know why google wouldn't send me to that page.

 

Is anyone using dealer, XP and bridge.exe (GIB's double dummy solver) together? I've used dealer and GIB together in the (distant) past, but can't seem to get them working together today. I seem to recall there were a couple of tricks to get things to work, but apparently can't remember what the tricks actually were.

 

EDIT: I have updated cygwin. The error message I get is "Can't open GIB." Is it possible that bridge.exe (GIB) does not run on XP?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes I have these working.

 

I think the problem is that bridge.exe might have been upgraded and the upgraded version does not work with dealer. This is some vague recollection of having problems with this several years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes I have these working.

 

I think the problem is that bridge.exe might have been upgraded and the upgraded version does not work with dealer. This is some vague recollection of having problems with this several years ago.

Thanks. I don't think I ever upgraded -- all I ever used GIB for was simulations -- but I'll see if I can find the original disc and make sure I'm using an old, old version.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes I have these working.

 

I think the problem is that bridge.exe might have been upgraded and the upgraded version does not work with dealer. This is some vague recollection of having problems with this several years ago.

I was using a bridge.exe from May of 1999. I got out the original disc and switched to the March 1999 version. Neither work. What is the date on your version?

 

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes I have these working.

 

I think the problem is that bridge.exe might have been upgraded and the upgraded version does not work with dealer.  This is some vague recollection of having problems with this several years ago.

I was using a bridge.exe from May of 1999. I got out the original disc and switched to the March 1999 version. Neither work. What is the date on your version?

 

Thanks.

April 1999

 

12/04/1999 9:52pm (DD/MM/YYYY format)

 

I am using a version of dealer named mdealer.exe which is dated 17/06/1999 9:30am

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes I have these working.

 

I think the problem is that bridge.exe might have been upgraded and the upgraded version does not work with dealer.  This is some vague recollection of having problems with this several years ago.

I was using a bridge.exe from May of 1999. I got out the original disc and switched to the March 1999 version. Neither work. What is the date on your version?

 

Thanks.

April 1999

 

12/04/1999 9:52pm (DD/MM/YYYY format)

 

I am using a version of dealer named mdealer.exe which is dated 17/06/1999 9:30am

Thanks again. The version of dealer.exe that I am using is dated 19 May 1999. (I modified and re-compiled it to include an alternate evaluation method, so the date isn't likely to match anyone else's version.)

 

I re-downloaded it today and attempted to compile, but cygwin gave me an error when I issued the "make" command.

 

What is the significance of the "m" in mdealer.exe?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...