Cascade Posted March 12, 2008 Report Share Posted March 12, 2008 Oh by the way ... I think 4NT is natural. This comes straight from the school that thinks if it can be natural it is natural. (Assuming no explicit discussion). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnasher Posted March 13, 2008 Report Share Posted March 13, 2008 I might bid 6♣ rather than 4NT with your partner's hand. You have competed with 4♣ so you will have something. Could that something be x xx AJxx ATxxxx? No I would bid 5♣ with that. I would have bid 1♣ with that, even in second. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foo Posted March 13, 2008 Report Share Posted March 13, 2008 E's hand may be too good for a simple 4N unless you have the explicit agreement that 4N here is Asking. Better may be for E to cuebid 4S with that moose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cascade Posted March 13, 2008 Report Share Posted March 13, 2008 I might bid 6♣ rather than 4NT with your partner's hand. You have competed with 4♣ so you will have something. Could that something be x xx AJxx ATxxxx? No I would bid 5♣ with that. I would have bid 1♣ with that, even in second. I might at favourable but wouldn't vulnerable and probably not nil vulnerable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.