rbforster Posted March 3, 2008 Report Share Posted March 3, 2008 This is hopefully an easy question, but how do you play these doubles? Case 1: (1♦)-P-(1NT)-X Case 2: (1♦)-P(you)-(1NT)-P;(P)-X Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pclayton Posted March 3, 2008 Report Share Posted March 3, 2008 1. Takeout2. Penalty - probably with some diamond length. #1 is pretty universal. #2 as penalty is a common interpretation, but I know of some that play the delayed double as TO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vuroth Posted March 3, 2008 Report Share Posted March 3, 2008 1. Takeout.2. Penalty makes the most sense, I guess. V Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbforster Posted March 3, 2008 Author Report Share Posted March 3, 2008 In case 2 when you double for penalty, how strong are these hands? With diamond length, perhaps a 15-18 1NT overcall was an option. Does this mean you have an unbalanced hand with diamonds or does double show you weren't quite strong enough to bid a 15-18 NT overcall the first time (hence maybe 13-bad 15). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pclayton Posted March 3, 2008 Report Share Posted March 3, 2008 In case 2 when you double for penalty, how strong are these hands? With diamond length, perhaps a 15-18 1NT overcall was an option. Does this mean you have an unbalanced hand with diamonds or does double show you weren't quite strong enough to bid a 15-18 NT overcall the first time (hence maybe 13-bad 15). ♠Ax ♥AJxx ♦AJxxx ♣xx or ♠x ♥AQx ♦AKJxx ♣Kxxx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dicklont Posted March 3, 2008 Report Share Posted March 3, 2008 Both are take out i.m.o. The penalty variation is so unlikely when partner has passed. It needs good diamonds and a bunch of highcards. You would probably double with that hand and bid NT in the next round. With VBxx HVxx xx BTx I don't want to give up yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zelandakh Posted March 7, 2008 Report Share Posted March 7, 2008 Clearly any modern bidder (one that isn't locked into Culbertson's 3 rules!) plays the first sequence as take-out. The simplest rule is to play that the delayed double (in 6th hand) shows length in Opener's first suit and is take-out of any second suit they might now be showing. So the second double is penalty. (-: Zel :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jlall Posted March 7, 2008 Report Share Posted March 7, 2008 Agree with t/o and pen. Rob F, I think you will find good results Xing with hands that are as light as 13 or 14 as long as they have strong trick taking potential like Ax Ax KQT9x Jxxx etc. You can also have very strong unbalanced hands with diamonds that would pass 1D (see pclaytons second example). This is one of my fav pen Xs because the deck is about even and we have a good lead that partner will make with the cards lying poorly for them. There is a huge upside and not a big downside (if they make it isnt game). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy_h Posted March 7, 2008 Report Share Posted March 7, 2008 1st T/O, 2nd Pen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kgr Posted March 7, 2008 Report Share Posted March 7, 2008 I play both of them as take out.(I play most DBL's as takeout unless it is agreed otherwise or unless it is clear.)I wonder if takeout is not better on 2nd hand...even more at MP's?eg with:AKxxKJxxJxxxx- - - or:AxxxKJxxxQxxx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts