Echognome Posted February 19, 2008 Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 [hv=d=w&v=n&n=sxxhjtxdat98cqxxx&s=saxhxdk7xxcakjt98]133|200|Scoring: MPP - P - P - 1♣Dbl - 2♣ - 3♥ - 5♣All Pass[/hv] East considers for some time before passing 5♣. Opening lead: ♠K So you get to this pushy 5♣, but it's not without hope. You win the ♠K lead, draw trumps (West 2, East 1) and try a heart hoping they will return a ♥ so you can ruff, eliminate hearts and then exit in spades to make them panic. Nope, East takes the ♥ and plays another spade. West wins and surprises you by playing a small diamond to the 8 - J and your K. As an added wrinkle, your opponents are pretty clueless. So what now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted February 19, 2008 Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 clueless people don't like to underlead Qxx, but QJ sec is so amazingly improbable a priori that I'll finesse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han Posted February 19, 2008 Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 Depends on how clueless. Bad opponents are typically not able to shift to a diamonds from Qxx(x) here so I'd play for the drop. Against opponents that are too bad even to notice that that would be dangerous I would finesse. Against good opponents I would also finesse of course. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeh Posted February 19, 2008 Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 It would help a little if you told us who played which hearts, and whether the spade J has appeared. We know that west passed originally and has shown up with the spade KQ. If we deduced, from the play to the critical point, that he also had 2 heart honours and the KQJ of spades, that would go a long way towards persuading me that East was 5=5=2=1 with QJ tight in diamonds... maybe not all the way tho :o Certainly, if I could deduce KQxx AQxx (?)xx xx in west, I'd play him for xxx in diamonds, but KQxx KQxx (?)xx xx is a different story. I would definitely cross in trump and lead the (remaining?) heart honour as a discovery play before committing in diamonds. Against clueless opps, unless I could draw inferences as above, I'd go for the restricted choice: I hate to allow clueless bridge to go unpunished.. and I dont think clueless opps know enough to give me a losing option on purpose :o Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han Posted February 19, 2008 Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 My earlier post was dumb. I need to think about it again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimG Posted February 19, 2008 Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 Won't a good opponent lead the Queen from Qxx (if they are going to break the suit)? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brianshark Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 I'm finessing against anyone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbforster Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 Won't a good opponent lead the Queen from Qxx (if they are going to break the suit)? Yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poky Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 Drop ♦QJ!!! 4432 and 5521 patterns are improbable, that is true. But 4342 and 5611 are even more improbable. So, I would not play RHO for 2 singletons and 6-5 majors. And playing LHO has lead diamonds from ♦Qxx is absurd, in this case I cannot make my game anyway, with normal defense. Furthermore, If I play for the drop and diamonds are Qxxx-J they are always cold for 4♥, so, it will be a good score. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jlall Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 Against good opponents this situation would like...never arise.. and if it did you would certainly play for the drop. Anyways which hearts were played (which honor did RHO win, did LHO tank when you played a heart up etc?) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 My earlier post was dumb. I need to think about it again. Not dumb, just clueless :) Against me you better play for the drop. I'll take the finesse over W, not only because of restricted choice but also because of his t/o double, he was probably 4432 and has most of the honors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 If opps are palookas, their cards are a bit random and it's therefore not surprising that LHO has ♦Qxx... probably playing the odds will pay here, and those odds are split honors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MFA Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 Against a good west, I will finesse. He might have deduced the entire distribution and be trying to cloud the issue with ♦Qxxx. There is no way he will compromise partner's potential ♦Q when holding three small. Against a bad west, I will most likely also finesse, but first I will consider what have happened in ♥ and ♠. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jlall Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 People act like bad players play cards at random. This is not true. They do try to think and apply a process to their game, it is just bad, hence them being bad. But they are definitely predictable and fall into "types" of bad players. Nobody plays random cards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 People act like bad players play cards at random. This is not true. They do try to think and apply a process to their game, it is just bad, hence them being bad. But they are definitely predictable and fall into "types" of bad players. Nobody plays random cards. Maybe you can read them better than me, because the only pattern I always get right is when a palooka LHO leads low and dummy has KJx I rise with the K and it holds because for a palooka "It's too risky to underlead a Q, but I can gotta be unlucky if I can't make a trick with Axx." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kfay Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 This hand is crazy because what's happening in the bidding? Did RHO bid 3♥ with 5-5 in the majors? Did LHO X with 5 spades and 4 hearts which means RHO bid 3♥ with 4=5? It seems clear to me that LHO started with 3 diamonds because otherwise this is just totally crazy. Probably LHO is 4=4=3=2 and RHO is 5=5=2=1. I finesse because if my partner doubles and I'm 5=5 with QJ live in diamonds and a stiff in opps' suit I'd be bidding more regardless of the fact that my partner is a PH. I admit I haven't looked at the vul. Something funny has happened at this point so I think it's entirely reasonable to assume that LHO doesn't think they're beating this unless pard has the ♦K, I'm finessing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bid_em_up Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 Probably LHO is 4=4=3=2 and RHO is 5=5=2=1. I finesse because if my partner doubles and I'm 5=5 with QJ live in diamonds and a stiff in opps' suit I'd be bidding more regardless of the fact that my partner is a PH. I admit I haven't looked at the vul. I think even a bad player could find a 3♣ bid when partner doubles and they are 5-5-2-1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Echognome Posted February 20, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 Sorry I wasn't more specific on the honors played. RHO was indeed 5=5=2=1 with QJ tight in diamonds. Afterwards I said I shouldn't have taken the losing option. Opponents had no idea what that meant. LHO with xxx in diamonds just said "I was hoping you had something in diamonds." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenrexford Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 Well, if they are really clueless, I think I'll play down the clubs until I have only one left. The opponents have to save hearts (they may think) and spades (they may think) and hearts. The person who does not have the diamond Queen may ditch these to save the hearts and spades. The person with Qx in front of A10, if that s occurring, may do something weird also. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kfay Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 Yet another case where I let a bad play by the opps get into my head. If I were to look at the hand and deduce RHO is 5=5=2=1 obviously my only hope is to play for QJ tight but now I let this play talk me out of my normal line. BLAH! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pclayton Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 Weird. The opponents have 9 spades, yet RHO jumps in hearts? Without knowing the location of the spades, I would think LHO has 5 crappy ones, but that obviously isn't the case. Something is definitely amiss, which happens a lot with poor players. I can't make it if LHO is 5=4=2=2, unless LHO made a weird play from Qx. It seems the main patterns I need to play for are 5=3=3=2 or 4=3=4=2. Since the latter seems impossible on the bidding, I'll try for QJ dub. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.