mikeh Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 [hv=d=s&v=b&n=skj9xhjdakxxc109xx&s=sahak109xxxxdxcajx]133|200|Scoring: IMPAfter an uncontested, brief auction to 6♥, the opps lead a low club. You win, csah the top trumps and RHO has Qxx. Cash the top ♠ and go to dummy. Your guess as to the order in which you play the top winners in dummy is, to your surprise, important. Would you guess right? If so, are you flipping a coin or reasoning it out?[/hv] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pclayton Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 The only thing I can see is that LHO is more apt to have ♠QTxxxxx than ♦QJTxxxx since he was silent. So I'll try the ♦ 1st. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CSGibson Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 Agree with Phil, mostly because a diamond wasn't led. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenrexford Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 If RHO plays a diamond on the first diamond, especially the Jack, this makes it more likely that I need to cash spade first, obviously. That said, I am inclined to cash spades first. I'm assuming a 1♥ opening by South. West is known to have a stiff heart. As a passed hand, he must be rather balanced in the two other suits (not the seven-bagger threat suit). That gives him either: (a.) ♠Q10xxxxx ♥x ♦xx(x) ♣xx(x) or(b.) ♠xx(x) ♥x ♦Q10xxxxx ♣xx(x) I cannot imagine passing 1♥ with (a.) unless 2♠ would have been an intermediate call, and there is no indication of any unusual systems. On (b.), however, it is very plausible for LHO to not want to make a three-level weak jump overcall with such a lousy suit. The bottom line is that any seven-bagger yields a hand that is, at a minimum, and eight-loser hand, or five tricks. That's enough for most to hop in with a two-level preemptive overcall but not a three-level overcall. Hence, the most likely seven-bager for LHO is diamonds. Furthermore, this also acknowledges that 3♦, not the boss suit, offers only immediate prospects, whereas 2♠ offers greater possibilities of long-term prospects when partner can cooperate. Heck, with (a.), game is very plausible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kgr Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 If RHO plays a diamond on the first diamond, especially the Jack, this makes it more likely that I need to cash spade first, obviously. And if RHO played ♠T ...or ♠Q under ♠A? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenrexford Posted February 18, 2008 Report Share Posted February 18, 2008 If RHO plays a diamond on the first diamond, especially the Jack, this makes it more likely that I need to cash spade first, obviously. And if RHO played ♠T ...or ♠Q under ♠A? The Queen would change things, but not the 10. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Codo Posted February 19, 2008 Report Share Posted February 19, 2008 I think that LHO had lead from QJTxxxx in Diamonds more often then from QTxxxxx in Spades, so I cash the Diamond first if no honour is played under the ace. And I don´t buy that QTxxxxx and out in spade is a more common weak jump then QJTxxxx in Diamonds. I would prefer the later by far. But I must admit that at the table just a high card in the first round of a suit or a lead of the suit had woken me up, else I had played the suits in random order. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.