Jump to content

New suit by advancer at the 3-level


Echognome

Recommended Posts

I play NF Constructive at the 2-level (after partner overcalls at the 1-level), forcing in all other situations.

 

Would also play 2NT here as some form of Lebensohl.

This is a good point. I guess my initial question was too vague and it sounds like a distinction between a 1-level and 2-level overcall is quite important.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is an example sequence:

 

(1) - 1 - (2) - 3

 

Do you think 3 should be forcing? If so, forcing to what level?

 

What if partner is a passed hand? Should it be forcing or not? Should it be fitted or not?

Not forcing

 

Not fitted

 

Unless a passed hand then I promise at least tolerance for partner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I prefer: forcing if responder passed over the overcall, and non-forcing if he bid or doubled.

 

In the sequence originally given, if you find yourself looking at a strong hand with clubs, you can probably get away with doubling and then bidding clubs, which would be forcing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NF and absolutely hate "fit" even by a passed hand. Forcing when they've opened and made a 2/1 doesn't make much sense to me.

 

I play your 1S-2H-p-3C as forcing though (3 over 2).

Is double a partial fit and clubs?

yes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...