cnszsun Posted February 8, 2008 Report Share Posted February 8, 2008 [hv=d=n&v=e&n=s85hj763dkjt72cq5&w=s76432ha82dq4cj64&e=sa9h954d863ckt872&s=skqjthkqtda95ca93]399|300|Scoring: IMP[/hv]West North East South - Pass Pass 2NT Pass 3♣ Pass 3♦ Pass 3♠ Pass 3NT Pass Pass Pass This is a hand i played on BBO, my partner, west, leads ♠ against this 3NT contract. At first sight, i thought ♣ lead would beat it, but later, i found it unbeatable.And, more interesting to me, the ♣ suit combo is almost the same as one deal in Julian Pottage's book <Play or Defend>. I just started to read it some days ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted February 8, 2008 Report Share Posted February 8, 2008 Is it so logical to put a low card in dummy at trick 1 when LHO leads ♣4? DD you're right however :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cascade Posted February 8, 2008 Report Share Posted February 8, 2008 Is it so logical to put a low card in dummy at trick 1 when LHO leads ♣4? DD you're right however :) Not at all logical I would have thought. I am happy to let GIB and Deep Finesse make these ones. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cnszsun Posted February 8, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 8, 2008 I am happy to let GIB and Deep Finesse make these ones.Yes, i did find this play when i was checking the hands with GIB.I posted it becuase it just appeared after i had got to know this blocking technique from books. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.