Jump to content

Vugraph 4


Cascade

Recommended Posts

[hv=d=w&v=n&n=sqt3hajdkq92ck753&w=sak52h8732d54ca98&e=sj874hkqtdatcjt64&s=s96h9654dj8763cq2]399|300|Scoring: IMP[/hv]

 

West North East South

 

 1NT   Dbl   RDbl  2

 Pass  Pass  Dbl   2

 Pass  Pass  2NT   Pass

 Pass  Pass  

 

DK DA D3 D4

S4 S6 SK S3

H3 HA HT H4

DQ DT D6 D5

D9 C4 DJ C8

D7 S2 D2 C6

D8 C9 C3 CT

C2 CA C5 CJ

H2 HJ HQ H5

HK H6 H7 C7

S7 S9 SA ST

S5 SQ S8 H9

CK SJ CQ H8

 

Our teammates had a disaster here. They had a misunderstanding and didn't run from 1NT. Maybe at these colours North shouldn't overcall 1NT.

 

We had our own problems. We avoided our own disaster by not doubling 2 which could be made.

 

Having decided not to double 2 I wanted to bid 2 but as a partnership we were on unfamiliar ground. I was worried that Chris might play me for five spades if I bid 2 and this suit was not good enough to pretend to be a five-bagger. On the other hand it seemed likely that partner had decent majors since he was unable to double either clubs or diamonds.

 

Do you bid 4-card majors freely here?

 

As an aside in the commentary Gerben claimed that 2 was a convention:

 

Gerben42: no this is the convention

Gerben42: 2@C = Natural, or @D+M

Gerben42: direct 2@D denies 4-card M

 

At the table it Zmudzinski was just mucking around - although this seems dangerous vulnerable. 2 was not alerted and at the end of the hand I specifically asked if it should have been as was told "of course" it was natural.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...