Jump to content

What Now


catch22

Recommended Posts

When I have an agreement about passes of redoubles, it is that they are for penalty if:

 

(1) our suit is well-positioned behind theirs, or

(2) auction is at the 2-level, and they have not bid and raised, or

(3) auction is at the 3-level

 

With no agreement, you are guessing, although I would expect a good player to want to defend here. I would probably pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

#1 yes, my regular partner would not

#2 no preference

#3 3H

 

It would be harder, if partner would not

be a passed hand. In this case, it could

very well be, that he is interested in playing

2S, but in the given situation I doubt it.

 

If we regular encounter people, who psych

the XX, we may change our agreement.

 

With kind regards

Marlowe

 

PS: My first question would be, what does XX

mean, it is always a great idea to ask about X

and XX, at least in germany, because X, XX and

Pass wont be alerted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would never pass undiscussed, would anyone really do that? You guys have balls lol. I think most people do not play this as a penalty (even though I think it should be penalty). If I was playing with a regular partner I would pass it out, but wayyyyyy too scared with a random.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is my understanding that passes of redoubles after preemptive openings are for business - otherwise, the partner of the preemptor could insert a psychic redouble anytime he felt that the takeout double was going to be passed out.

 

If I have had an opportunity to discuss this with a partner, that is certainly my choice.

 

Passes over redoubles at the one-level pass the buck - they say that the passer has no clear action, but it is DEFINITELY NOT for penalties.

 

However, after a preemptive opening bid, the situation is different. The frequency of a penalty pass is higher. So one must not let the opponent's redouble change the meaning of our call.

 

I have a strong belief that this treatment is close enough to being universal among experts that I would assume that the pass is for penalties even if we have not discussed it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would never pass undiscussed, would anyone really do that?

Well, if LHO is talking serious, 3 is probably gonna be a bloodbath, so we might as well try our luck in 2 rdbled :)

 

But yeah, I agree I'd probably pull to 3 opposite a random. My pass was done assuming pet pard (that's what the poster asked).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Passes over redoubles at the one-level pass the buck - they say that the passer has no clear action, but it is DEFINITELY NOT for penalties.

 

2. However, after a preemptive opening bid, the situation is different.  The frequency of a penalty pass is higher.  So one must not let the opponent's redouble change the meaning of our call.

1. In Europe, it's common to play

 

(1x) dbl (rdbl) pass

 

as to play. Especially if x = minor. This is probably the only situation were you'd want to play pass as "no preference". At the 2+ level or in the case of

 

(1x) pass (pass) dbl

(rdbl) pass

 

this certainly is to play, since pard has his cards over opener's.

 

 

2. Especially if opps are walruses, to whom "weak 2 = 6-10 hcp, 6 cards", regardless of suit strength :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. In Europe, it's common to play

 

(1x) dbl (rdbl) pass

 

as to play. Especially if x = minor. This is probably the only situation were you'd want to play pass as "no preference". At the 2+ level or in the case of

 

(1x) pass (pass) dbl

(rdbl) pass

 

this certainly is to play, since pard has his cards over opener's.

Your example 1. is defenitly not standard as to play where I live. It is "no clear call".

 

And Nr 2 is doubtfull too. Without an agreement I would never ever pass. XX for business may be the best idea, but surely not without agreement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To play... especially if opps are walruses, to whom "weak 2 = 6-10 hcp, 6 cards", regardless of suit strength :)

I'm not sure what you're trying to imply about walruses, and I probably don't want to hear what you call the folks playing "weak 2 = 3-8 hcp, 5+ cards" either!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victor_Mollo ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In Norway it's standard that 1x - X - XX - p is no preference.

Some play it as penalty - I have done so - but not many.

 

Last time I looked, we were part of Europe (though not EU), so saying pass as penalty is standard in Europe isn't correct. It may be in parts of Europe for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...