jdonn Posted January 28, 2008 Report Share Posted January 28, 2008 So hoping to understand it correct now: The false preference here is a kind of waiting bid, asking opener to show a little bid more about his hand, instead of describing more of the own hand. (It is not completly undescreptive, but could include many more possible hands then I had thought about) Exactly B) There is a style in which responder can preference to opener's first suit on even a singleton, making the bid essentially 100% artificial, but that is not standard. Really it should show at least a doubleton. So your 5215 example is free to bid 4♣ with this very good club support and lack of suitability for 3NT. The 5224 hand would do well to bid 3♦ instead of 4♣ because the club support is bad, and it doesn't rule out 3NT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pclayton Posted January 28, 2008 Report Share Posted January 28, 2008 I think a normal auction has the bidding starting 1♦ - 1♠ - 2♣ - 2♦ - 3♦. North might take another call, but thats dubious. I disagree, 3♦ should show 6-4. South's third bid is a matter of style, either 2♥ or 2♠. Indeed. I would expect 2♥ and 2♠ to be 1354 and 3154. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimG Posted January 28, 2008 Report Share Posted January 28, 2008 Indeed. I would expect 2♥ and 2♠ to be 1354 and 3154. You're never dealt 2254? Or, do you always rebid 2N regardless of stopper in the 4th suit? (When you want to move over 2♦.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han Posted January 28, 2008 Report Share Posted January 28, 2008 Agree that 1D.. 2C... 3D.... should show 6-4 in the minors. With 2254 I'd rebid 2NT (with a heart stopper) or 2H (without). I don't think showing a heart fragment in this auction is very important. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted January 29, 2008 Author Report Share Posted January 29, 2008 does 3♣ promise 4 clubs... ? :huh: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skjaeran Posted January 29, 2008 Report Share Posted January 29, 2008 does 3♣ promise 4 clubs... ? :unsure: Depens on who you ask. :) To me it strongly suggest 5. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted January 29, 2008 Report Share Posted January 29, 2008 does 3♣ promise 4 clubs... ? :unsure: Yes. But it is common to bid 3Con a 3 carder to create agame forcing situation. With kind regardsMarlowe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted January 29, 2008 Report Share Posted January 29, 2008 Why is 3♣ horrible?I thought the requirements are 19-21 total points (HCP + Length) and isn't taht what South has?Admitedly the Jx in hearts may be worthless What am I misunderstanding?<nothing> Nothing. You may or may not bid 3C, as long as you know, that 3C is game forcing, the alternative would be 2C.3C is an overbid, 2C is an underbid,choose and be prepared to pay the price. Since you hold 3 jacks, the HCP methodto evaluate the strength of the hand,overstates the power of the hand to a certain degree. With kind regardsMarlowe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted January 29, 2008 Author Report Share Posted January 29, 2008 As a totally unrelated question, I held AQx A AQTxxx Axx today. 1♦-1♥? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jlall Posted January 29, 2008 Report Share Posted January 29, 2008 As a totally unrelated question, I held AQx A AQTxxx Axx today. 1♦-1♥? 3C. Nobody who plays regular 2/1 or SAYC systems can play 3C shows 4 without having some kind of artificial agreement in place (like 2N forcing or art 2S or w/e). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.