CSGibson Posted January 18, 2008 Report Share Posted January 18, 2008 [hv=d=s&v=b&s=shaqtdak8532cq843]133|100|Scoring: MPNo interference:1♦ 1♠, 2♣ 2♥*, 3♦ 3N, ? *artificial game force[/hv] Do you agree with South's bidding? Do you make another call? What is the call you make? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike777 Posted January 18, 2008 Report Share Posted January 18, 2008 This really depends..on your open bid style.If you promise 14+ hcp...okIF you promise junk......well......ok....end of story...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted January 18, 2008 Report Share Posted January 18, 2008 Hi, reformatting the auction 1♦ 1♠,2♣ 2♥*, 3♦ 3N, ? I agree with the auction, if you would play IMPs,I would say 4D is clear, but since it is MP, I would most likely pass, but I would not bevery happy with my decision. With kind regardsMarlowe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerben42 Posted January 18, 2008 Report Share Posted January 18, 2008 If you are going to bid 4♦ now you show a weak hand with huge distribution. Rather you should bid 4♦ the round before, showing a hand close to a 3♣ rebid, and 6 - 4. On second thought, why not bid 2NT first showing your stopper. Maybe partner does NOT bid 3NT now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
655321 Posted January 18, 2008 Report Share Posted January 18, 2008 If you are going to bid 4♦ now you show a weak hand with huge distribution. Rather you should bid 4♦ the round before, showing a hand close to a 3♣ rebid, and 6 - 4.I must admit I have no agreements about these sequences.Is there a danger partner will take 4♦ last round to show a solid ♦ suit? The original auction seems reasonable to me.I like 4NT now. Then partner will have a pretty good idea about your hand, except for the spade void. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted January 18, 2008 Report Share Posted January 18, 2008 I like passing here but otherwise agree with 655321. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finch Posted January 18, 2008 Report Share Posted January 18, 2008 I woudl pass. The hand screams of a misfit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the hog Posted January 18, 2008 Report Share Posted January 18, 2008 I really dislike the 3D bid and feel that 2NT showing the H stopper is far superior; the D suit is not THAT good by the way. Anyway, I would pass now - my S void opposite pd's S suit does not augur well for a higher denominational contract. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted January 18, 2008 Report Share Posted January 18, 2008 2NT? no way. Either bid 3♥ or 3♦, but never 2NT, the hand is slammish and we need to show our distribution if we wanna find a fit to play in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnasher Posted January 18, 2008 Report Share Posted January 18, 2008 (edited) I agree with South's bidding so far. If you bid 2NT over 2H partner s going to picture a 1=3=5=4 shape; if you bid 3H he's going to picture a ?=?=6=4 shape. I know which I prefer. I don't agree that 4D over 2H would have shown any strong 6-4. After 2H, the obvious way to play the different sequences is:4D Good hand, good diamonds3D-3NT-4D Good hand, less good diamonds (but see below)3D-3NT-5D Weak hand that didn't want to play 3NT After the given auction, over 3NT I'd pass. With a weak 6=4 I'd have bid 1D-1S-2D, so partner already expects me to have a reasonable hand. If I were to move, I'd bid 4H, which seems blindingly obvious with this shape and such good hearts. PS If anyone thinks they saw an earlier post from me expressing a different opinion, they must have imagined it. Edited January 18, 2008 by gnasher Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pclayton Posted January 18, 2008 Report Share Posted January 18, 2008 Stick a fork in me, I'm done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han Posted January 18, 2008 Report Share Posted January 18, 2008 Clear pass imo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matmat Posted January 18, 2008 Report Share Posted January 18, 2008 according to the rules of the game I have to make another call. I do not, however, make a bid. I pass.P is, quite possibly, already relying on our club stopper, maybe they have a card there, who knows. p has heard us. we he are xx64, we probably don't have three spades, or, even, two spades to an honor. p should not have three decent diamonds or 4 clubs; someone above mentioned this is screaming a misfit? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han Posted January 18, 2008 Report Share Posted January 18, 2008 Are you sure that partner does not have 4 clubs? I'm not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted January 18, 2008 Report Share Posted January 18, 2008 Seems like an easy pass. We don't need any fit at all, partner can certainly be 5413 or even 6313. We have not that much extra and have shown our shape at least as far as the suits where we might have a fit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matmat Posted January 18, 2008 Report Share Posted January 18, 2008 Are you sure that partner does not have 4 clubs? I'm not. no, but i'd expect p not to have extras or control cards if they have 4 card club support. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the hog Posted January 19, 2008 Report Share Posted January 19, 2008 Are you sure that partner does not have 4 clubs? I'm not. Well perhaps she has 5. Oh, you mean 3?! No way; you have posted this in the Advanced/Expert forum and I wouldn't expect a player of that calibre to bid non-existent suits. :) (I know some posters would, but none of the people I played with would and I certainly would not.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted January 19, 2008 Report Share Posted January 19, 2008 I'm gonna pass. If I need some "action" I'd try a natural 4NT invite. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skjaeran Posted January 20, 2008 Report Share Posted January 20, 2008 Partner took the slow route to 3NT, going via 4th suit. It's clear that he's got some interest here. You can't be sure he's slammish; he could be looking for some other rebid than 3♦ - either 3♣ or 3♠, just to find the best game. With two empty suits and a void in partners suit I think it's an overbid to raise to 4NT - which is the only bid I can envisage. I'm better than minimum, but I'll pass. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MFA Posted January 20, 2008 Report Share Posted January 20, 2008 Pass.We could have a slam, but it's not very likely. I'm not close to be bidding on, because we have no tricks and no safety, if we catch a misfit opposite. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han Posted January 21, 2008 Report Share Posted January 21, 2008 Are you sure that partner does not have 4 clubs? I'm not. Well perhaps she has 5. Oh, you mean 3?! No way; you have posted this in the Advanced/Expert forum and I wouldn't expect a player of that calibre to bid non-existent suits. :D (I know some posters would, but none of the people I played with would and I certainly would not.) Partner never bid clubs, think you are confusing this with another thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CSGibson Posted January 21, 2008 Author Report Share Posted January 21, 2008 I did not bid on, but considered it for a long time before passing for the reasons explained by the other posters. Full NS hand: [hv=d=s&v=b&n=sakqj7hj983d97ca6&s=shaqtdak8532cq843]133|200|Scoring: MP[/hv] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted January 21, 2008 Report Share Posted January 21, 2008 Without a close examination of what contract we belong in, all I can say is 3NT is a distant 4th choice of bids for north to me. In my preferred methods north bids 3♥ to say "nothing useful to add, no suit I want to raise or rebid, 3-4 hearts implied else I would have another bid to make" over which south would easily bid 3NT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finch Posted January 21, 2008 Report Share Posted January 21, 2008 Without a close examination of what contract we belong in, all I can say is 3NT is a distant 4th choice of bids for north to me. In my preferred methods north bids 3♥ to say "nothing useful to add, no suit I want to raise or rebid, 3-4 hearts implied else I would have another bid to make" over which south would easily bid 3NT. 3rd for me.Either 3♥ or 3♠ would seem normal. You don't really have a heart stop, and you have a rather nice spade suit that might be worth another mention. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.