Jump to content

Follow-ups


pclayton

Recommended Posts

Matt and I had an expensive misunderstanding (I take 100% credit btw) in a tg tonight.

 

Here's a sequence:

 

(1) pass (2) 3

(pass) 3 (pass)..?

 

Question 1. Does 3 promise a fit? Tolerance? neither?

 

Question 2A. What is 4 by the 3 bidder?

.............2B. What is 4?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think 3S promises a fit but it will usually have one since it doesn't seem to have a good 5 card suit (pass over 1S with a good hand), and doesn't seem to have a spade stopper (no 3N over 3D). I suppose something like xxx KQx Ax Axxxx is possible or possibly xxx KQxx Ax QJxx if you don't make t/o Xs with this hand type. It seems like all other hand types will have a diamond fit.

 

4H over 3S is obviously natural, trying to find a 4-4 fit. 4C is obviously natural, trying to find a fit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Without discussion I had taken 4 of a new suit as a control with a strong hand in the context of the bidding so far.

To say: 3 Spade normaly has a Diamond fit and 4 / are looking for another place to play sounds wrong. I think it is either or and that 3 Spade normaly establishs a fit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what's up with all these "problems" recently?

 

4H and 4C are both natural.

3S shows a diamond fit (note that in this sequence Hx is a fit, though I would usually expect a third one).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what's up with all these "problems" recently?

 

4H and 4C are both natural.

3S shows a diamond fit (note that in this sequence Hx is a fit, though I would usually expect a third one).

I agree.

 

The 3 bidder cannot have a great hand from his failure to bid in direct seat over 1 and his failure to bid 3NT now. So he must have a fit.

 

All subsequent bids are natural.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I don't think you can answer B without a firm agreement on A. If 3 does not promise a fit, then 4 and 4 should be natural. That's pretty obvious to me

 

If 3 promised a fit, then I think its more dubious that 4 is natural and suggesting an alternate strain.

 

If 2N is two places to play over 2 (isn't that relevant here?), it also discounts this possibility.

 

I do agree that 3 doesn't promise a fit. Otherwise you are stuck with a bid holding a very generic hand like: xxxx AKxx Kx Axx. But this sequence is one of the rare cases where a cue bid in response to an overcall does not promise a fit for partner, assuming you play transfer advances in many sequences.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do agree that 3 doesn't promise a fit. Otherwise you are stuck with a bid holding a very generic hand like: xxxx AKxx Kx Axx. But this sequence is one of the rare cases where a cue bid in response to an overcall does not promise a fit for partner, assuming you play transfer advances in many sequences.

Agree with whom?

 

Do we get the hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do agree that 3 doesn't promise a fit. Otherwise you are stuck with a bid holding a very generic hand like: xxxx AKxx Kx Axx. But this sequence is one of the rare cases where a cue bid in response to an overcall does not promise a fit for partner, assuming you play transfer advances in many sequences.

Agree with whom?

 

Do we get the hand.

No you don't get the hand. It was a total disaster, quite possibly the worst thing I've ever perpetuated at the table in the last year.

 

I'm agreeing with everyone that states 3 does not promise a fit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...