Jump to content

1NT-2NT conventional


Recommended Posts

This bidding sequence came up tonight (simple enough): 1NT-2NT*

 

The alert was: bad doubleton

He held:

 

xx

Ax

AJ8xx

A10xx

 

Openers responses:

3NT if no slam interest

3C asks

- 3D hearts

- 3H spades

 

Guess the criteria is slam interest with the minors or looking for 6NT holding 2245 or alike... somebody care to comment? Is this widely used? It should be said that 1NT-2 is also used as minor suit investigation - I see some redundancy..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know a number of systems in which 2NT asks for a weak doubleton.

I don't see the merit in showing one...

 

For example, the Scanian NT structure uses 2N to ask for a weak doubleton. This bid is used as either

 

1. Anti-Lemming

2. A way to determine whether a long minor with two top honors is likely to run

 

The Scanians couple this with a 2 bid that asks responder to show a 4 card major with a maximum hand. Responder holds either

 

1. A slam oriented hand with both minors

2. Weak with both minors

3. Weak with long Diamonds

4. Game invitational strength with no 4 card major

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know a number of systems in which 2NT asks for a weak doubleton.

I don't see the merit in showing one...

Why not? If you want an anti-lemming bid, isn't it better to tell the opponents about dummy's weakness rather than declarer's?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know a number of systems in which 2NT asks for a weak doubleton.

I don't see the merit in showing one...

Why not? If you want an anti-lemming bid, isn't it better to tell the opponents about dummy's weakness rather than declarer's?

All other things being equal, yes...

 

However, all things are not equal

 

1. I don't see any way that this anti-lemming bid can be profitably combined with other hand types

2. I think that hands suitable for this bid are too rare to justify the use of bidding space

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have played a NT sytem with asks for a weak doubleton after Stayman. The purpose is to avoid bad 3N contracts that would make half the time when opponents don't find the right lead, and instead play 4m or 5m going down as well.

(Yeah I am exaggerating but it is really not clear to me that they are useful.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use a NT structure that involves figuring out whether or not vulnerable suits are involved. To me this structure is hitting on the right idea's ugly cousin.

 

The idea that 2NT promises a weak doubleton is misled. I'm not saying that I know what the solution is but here's the system that my partner and I employ.

 

1NT-2NT is game forcing. Over this opener has several options:

 * 3 asks responder if they have a weak doubleton

  - 3 says you have a weak doubleton in a minor

   -> 3 asks

    ->> 3 shows club doubleton

    ->> 3NT shows diamond doubleton

  - 3 of a major shows shortness in that major

 * 3 is staymanish

  - responder, if they have a 4-card major, bids the OTHER

 * 3 / shows a 5-card suit

 * 3NT is to play

 

If you're playing that 2NT guarantess a small doubleton it seems to me that if you're not going to be playing 3NT that there's some better place to play than 2NT. So this system seems a little odd to me.

 

I've found that there's ample room to include all minor-suit transfers and balanced-invites (ask if you want me to go into more detail). We've had great success with this structure considering it doesn't come up all too frequently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think showing a weak doubleton is paying mostly be when the hand with the weak doubleton has 3 in the other M so 4M is a real possibility. Showing a weak doubleton with hope of making 5m or stopping in 4m isnt likely to pay that much.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think showing a weak doubleton is paying mostly be when the hand with the weak doubleton has 3 in the other M so 4M is a real possibility. Showing a weak doubleton with hope of making 5m or stopping in 4m isnt likely to pay that much.

Yes. The biggest successes I've had have been playing in the 4M moysian.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The power precision 1NT structre has something similar

 

 

2S :: [minor suit stayman] relay to 2N, promises (45) in minors

2N : 3C :: 5+5+ minors, 0-9 HCP

3D : to play

2N : 3D :: 5+5+ minors, 10+ HCP, forcing to 4m

2N : 3H :: 31(45), 10+ HCP

2N : 3S :: 13(45), 10+ HCP

2N : 3N :: 22(45), 10-13 HCP, both doubletons weak

2N :: relay to 3C

3C : P :: 6+ clubs, obviously to play

3D :: 6+ diamonds, sign-off

 

3H :: 40(54), 8+ HCP

3S :: 04(54), 8+ HCP

3N :: 22(54), 14-15 HCP, both doubletons weak

4m :: 5+, balanced, 15-16 HCP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I doubt that this convention makes a lot of sense,

at least the way you have described it.

 

Opener should be able to judge if it is a good idea

to look for slam, just because responder has xx in

a suit?

This can only make only sense, if responder promises

additional features, e.g. he can only make this bid with

a (semi) bal. shape and values sufficient for a quantitative

4NT. => The alert would be fairly incomplete.

 

Assuming that this is the case, I would say the frequency

of the 2NT bid is fairly low, and you may use this bid for

something more frequent.

 

With kind regards

Marlowe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...