nielsfoged Posted January 2, 2008 Report Share Posted January 2, 2008 [hv=d=n&v=b&s=sajt864h4dak5ckj5]133|100|Scoring: IMPPass-Pass-1♠(5+)-Pass, 2♥(5+)-Pass-?[/hv] This hand was presented as a bidding problem on our local Danish bridgesite, and most (including experts) saw it as an easy 3♠. Obviously, I understand the arguments for that bid, but still I personally went for the direct 3NT. That may not always end the bidding, but 4♠ will typically only be reached if Responder has a 3-card support. In contrast, the more popular 3♠ is forcing, and could lead to 3NT (frequently with 0 or 1 spade, rarely with 2 spades) or 4♠ (frequently with 2- or 3- card support). Where I come from, a vulnerable pass followed by 2♥ over 1♠ will typically show exactly 5 cards and 9-10 hcps (or perhaps 6+ hearts with too many (3+?) spades for a decent 2♦(Multi)/2♥/3♥-opening, planning to support ♠ no matter what next round - if any!). Thus, I assume it will be quite rare for Responder to follow up with a bid of 4 Minor or even 4♥, whether Opener rebids 3♠ or 3NT. Please feel free to comment on:- Openers 2nd bid- Any of the above assumptions- Your expectations of winning 3NT and 4S, respectively, if Responder has exactly 2-5 in the majors, and 9-10 hcps. Maybe someone can run a simulation? /Niels Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awm Posted January 2, 2008 Report Share Posted January 2, 2008 In many places/styles, opener could rebid 2♠ as a forcing call. This potentially helps a lot (saves a great deal of space). Presumably in Denmark a 2♠ rebid is NF (this is also what I gather from Roland's posts). Another possibility is to rebid 2NT if that is forcing. This still gives space to sort out any potential spade fit and offer a choice of games. I'll assume that 2NT would also be NF. Now we're down to a choice between 3♠ and 3NT (or I suppose manufacturing a minor suit bid). Perhaps some of the reasoning for 3♠: (1) Bidding 3♠ allows partner to bid 3NT with ♠xx if that seems best. Bidding 3NT doesn't allow partner to correct to 4♠ on doubleton. (2) Bidding 3NT might suggest doubleton heart, and encourage partner to correct to 4♥ with a bad six-card suit. Presumably not all six-card heart suits are viable first seat preempts at vulnerable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted January 2, 2008 Report Share Posted January 2, 2008 It's an easy 3♠ call. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.