sceptic Posted December 28, 2007 Report Share Posted December 28, 2007 Do you think the world would be a better place if adults did not contaminate thier kids with thier own views on Religion, Politics and Racism Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrTodd13 Posted December 28, 2007 Report Share Posted December 28, 2007 This is an offensive question and a dangerous suggestion. It assumes that a bunch of bureaucrats in the school system are better placed to decide on truth and proper values and then to insist that everyone conform. This reminds me of a Brave New World. Children are going to soak up whatever they are exposed to whether that be from parents, from teachers, or from TV. If parents don't do anything, you wind up with self-absorbed, state worshipping, consumers. This is exactly the kind of people that the state wants. Truth and morality are ultimately considered either unknowable or non-existent. If you don't think that the state teaches some form of racism then ask yourself what nationalism is? Nationalism teaches that you are to prefer the benefit of one kind of people that are near you compared to a typically different kind of people farther away. Draw some arbitrary line and then prohibit people from pursuing their own happiness on the other side of the border in order to benefit those already on this side of the border. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joshs Posted December 28, 2007 Report Share Posted December 28, 2007 Do you think the world would be a better place if adults did not contaminate thier kids with thier own views on Religion, Politics and Racism Boy thats a loaded question. Speaking as a jew, you can't very easily just one day say "I am interested in judiasm, let me decide to be a jew." In order for my child to have any idea if they like judiasm, they need an immersion in jewish life, which involves lots of work (and probably requires learning Hebrew). Fundamental to judiasm (as oppossed to chistianity) is the notion that "from actions come beliefs". there is an emphasis on what you do, not on what you beleive, just as there is much more of an emphesis on this world, as oppossed to the next... Anyway, lets temporarily ignore the ritualistic issues and the behavioral issues associated with "beliefs", although I fundamentally think you can't ignore those. How can you not teach values and ideas to your kids? If you tell you child to not hit your neighbor's kid you are imparting values. Everything you do or say carries moral content, and typically political content as well. Whether you say "I always vote for republicans because they believe in traditional family values" or just merely teach those values to your kids or merely act according to those values your actions will have a similar impact on your child. I you beat your child that will impart values. If you instead talk to your child that imparts values. This is not to say that your children's beliefs will be wholy determined by your "actions" but it does have influence...So I think the question is close to meaningless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EricK Posted December 28, 2007 Report Share Posted December 28, 2007 Speaking as a jew, you can't very easily just one day say "I am interested in judiasm, let me decide to be a jew." In order for my child to have any idea if they like judiasm, they need an immersion in jewish life... But if you immerse them in Jewish life you are depriving them of the chance to be immersed in, say, a Buddhist life. As to the OP, rather than not expose children to any religious or political beliefs, it would be better to expose them to as many religious and political beliefrs as possible. This is really the only way to allow them to make an enlightened choice. And as a bonus it will tend to steer them away from the more extrem viewpoints. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sceptic Posted December 28, 2007 Author Report Share Posted December 28, 2007 Boy thats a loaded question. Speaking as a jew, you can't very easily just one day say "I am interested in judiasm Yes granted, but it is a serious question I am a non believer and by that I mean, I do not beleive in the existance of God, any God for that matter and I accept that people are entitled to thier beliefs and I respect that, it is their belief, even though I actually believe that the same people, if their parents were Muslims or Quakers or Jehovahs witnesses, then that is what their belief would be you see what I am trying to get at is, that children will follow in their parents footsteps, how many Muslim kids brought up, suddenly change to Judism or Catholosism aged 18. is it not fair to say once brought up in a religion then that is what you bec ome and that main point I am making is that THere is no choice for these kids, their parents make them what they are the same applies to a lesser degree with politics and perhaps more so for racist views I also disagree with Dr Todd that it is an offensive question, it is a question he may feel uncomfortable with but it is a question and that is all it is as for a dangerous suggestion, why is it a dangerous suggestion (perhaps because you do not like the possible answers) ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sceptic Posted December 28, 2007 Author Report Share Posted December 28, 2007 Children are going to soak up whatever they are exposed to I believe that this is true Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike777 Posted December 28, 2007 Report Share Posted December 28, 2007 Do you think the world would be a better place if adults did not contaminate thier kids with thier own views on Religion, Politics and Racism Interesting idea. Sort of reminds me of one of the truly great books on parenting called Lord of the Flies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sceptic Posted December 28, 2007 Author Report Share Posted December 28, 2007 Boy thats a loaded question. Speaking as a jew, you can't very easily just one day say "I am interested in judiasm, let me decide to be a jew." In order for my child to have any idea if they like judiasm, they need an immersion in jewish life, which involves lots of work (and probably requires learning Hebrew). Fundamental to judiasm (as oppossed to chistianity) is the notion that "from actions come beliefs". there is an emphasis on what you do, not on what you beleive, just as there is much more of an emphesis on this world, as oppossed to the next... I hope I am not being offensive here, but I would like to know something, whilst I accept what you say is probally correct from your prospective, what do you teach your children as a balancing view on religion say "percentage wise" how much of other religious view points do you put into a positive light for that child to make a concious decision and where do you tell them that they need to make a decision about what religion they may want to follow of their own choice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joshs Posted December 28, 2007 Report Share Posted December 28, 2007 Speaking as a jew, you can't very easily just one day say "I am interested in judiasm, let me decide to be a jew." In order for my child to have any idea if they like judiasm, they need an immersion in jewish life... But if you immerse them in Jewish life you are depriving them of the chance to be immersed in, say, a Buddhist life. As to the OP, rather than not expose children to any religious or political beliefs, it would be better to expose them to as many religious and political beliefrs as possible. This is really the only way to allow them to make an enlightened choice. And as a bonus it will tend to steer them away from the more extrem viewpoints. That is correct. It is not possible to offer all possible lifes to your child. You can offer them: a Nothingb A Choice between Nothing and Judiasmc. A choice between Budism and Judiasm and Nothing (where Budism and Judiasm are tought less in depth, and you can't possibly be immersed since you are learning a competing set of practices and beliefs) Its of course possible that you can teach your child more then one thing. but you can't teach everything. This is like telling me that I should not teach my child to speak english because what if my child prefers french, and I am forcing english on him/her.... Teaching your child something usually gives them a choice, teaching them nothing usualy does not offer a choice.... As to your more the merrier. Its nice to say that, and I am all for exposing people to more things, but there is a big difference between the 30 second cartoon version of ideas/lifestyles and actually teaching them about these things. You certainly can't teach someone how to live a jewish life as part of a survey of religions, and I don't think budism is that much easier. Having said all that, I used to be a part of a weekly inter-religous discussion group back when I lived in DC (discussion once a week and visited one of the members house of worship once a month) and that was a very edjucational experience (although I can't say what its like to live my life immersed in a different religion). I have always thought that pluralism was a good thing. But I don't think you can ever escape Rousseau's Paradox of Freedom.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenberg Posted December 28, 2007 Report Share Posted December 28, 2007 How do you not teach religion or politics? Of course parents will teach what they believe. I'm reminded of a conversation I had when I was young (12 or so) . The Korean War was in full swing and I ardently followed the progress everyday. My mother was adamantly against war. In exasperation she told me Mom: All wars are about oil Me: Mom, I don't think there is any oil in Korea Mom: There is. Me: Who says so? Mom: They are fighting there, there's oil there. Parents don't have the luxury of non-committal. They have to raise their kids, and how else but by what they believe to be true? Most of us survive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted December 28, 2007 Report Share Posted December 28, 2007 I feel like my parents didn't influence me much on politics/religion/racism (my grand father did). Am I deceiving myself?, Does everyone feel the same? I agree you would get rid of Nationalism, racism and other bad stuff if the childs would grew up in another country. But why would you like to destroy something so good as religion? B). I am pretty sure there are people who think it is ok to get rid of politics/religion or racism/religion but keeping the other hehe. And I am also pretty sure that if you got rid of the 3 of them they would reappear later. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joshs Posted December 28, 2007 Report Share Posted December 28, 2007 Boy thats a loaded question. Speaking as a jew, you can't very easily just one day say "I am interested in judiasm Yes granted, but it is a serious question I am a non believer and by that I mean, I do not beleive in the existance of God, any God for that matter and I accept that people are entitled to thier beliefs and I respect that, it is their belief, even though I actually believe that the same people, if their parents were Muslims or Quakers or Jehovahs witnesses, then that is what their belief would be you see what I am trying to get at is, that children will follow in their parents footsteps, how many Muslim kids brought up, suddenly change to Judism or Catholosism aged 18. is it not fair to say once brought up in a religion then that is what you bec ome and that main point I am making is that THere is no choice for these kids, their parents make them what they are the same applies to a lesser degree with politics and perhaps more so for racist views I also disagree with Dr Todd that it is an offensive question, it is a question he may feel uncomfortable with but it is a question and that is all it is as for a dangerous suggestion, why is it a dangerous suggestion (perhaps because you do not like the possible answers) ? Yeah, but my point is how many kids not brought up on anything become jewish later. In fact, there is a whole spectrum of beliefs and practices, but those that "choose judiasm" as an adult usually end up at one of the extremes, and I don't think thats an accident. Try going to a Conservative or Orthodox service and see if you have any idea what is going on. There is an extreme selection bias here becomes someone has to put many years of effort (as an adult) to be able to get much out of the experience and they have to decide to put this effort in before they see the value of the experience. Hence it hardly ever happens. In general, you can't choose to do something that you were never taught how to do. Christianity does not involve nearly that much work, but there still is stuff to learn. Someone can't choose between playing baseball and soccer without playing enough baseball and soccer to be able to value the experience. Religion is even more complex since religous behavior involves every second of your life. As my mother likes saying the fundamental goal of a religous life is to make every moment holy, to recognize the presence of the divine in every moment and in every action that we take. This is not just about where we go on the weekend and what prayers we say. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sceptic Posted December 28, 2007 Author Report Share Posted December 28, 2007 Yeah, but my point is how many kids not brought up on anything become jewish later. ok, I concede I do not know, but how many do you think >? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joshs Posted December 28, 2007 Report Share Posted December 28, 2007 Boy thats a loaded question. Speaking as a jew, you can't very easily just one day say "I am interested in judiasm, let me decide to be a jew." In order for my child to have any idea if they like judiasm, they need an immersion in jewish life, which involves lots of work (and probably requires learning Hebrew). Fundamental to judiasm (as oppossed to chistianity) is the notion that "from actions come beliefs". there is an emphasis on what you do, not on what you beleive, just as there is much more of an emphesis on this world, as oppossed to the next... I hope I am not being offensive here, but I would like to know something, whilst I accept what you say is probally correct from your prospective, what do you teach your children as a balancing view on religion say "percentage wise" how much of other religious view points do you put into a positive light for that child to make a concious decision and where do you tell them that they need to make a decision about what religion they may want to follow of their own choice Yeah, this is hard. Especially since some religions/belief systems involve the idea that all others are very wrong. Hopefully, your belief system is more enlightened so you can teach your child the value of your religion while also teaching your child that there are other ways to live. This is a big difference between religions. Jews, for instance, believe that non Jews can be good people and can go to heaven. In fact, the main difference is that Jews have more rules thay have to follow. God told us how to live a good life, but it involes more work in order to get the rewards. Some religions fundamentally believe that people from other religions can't go to heaven. that creates a much larger obstical to teaching your children pluralistic ideas... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macaw Posted December 28, 2007 Report Share Posted December 28, 2007 The only reason to have children is to brain wash them. Can't imagine why you'd want to have them otherwise B) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joshs Posted December 28, 2007 Report Share Posted December 28, 2007 Kahil Gibran from The Prophet: And a woman who held a babe against her bosom said, "Speak to us of Children." And he said: Your children are not your children. They are the sons and daughters of Life's longing for itself. They come through you but not from you, And though they are with you, yet they belong not to you. You may give them your love but not your thoughts. For they have their own thoughts. You may house their bodies but not their souls, For their souls dwell in the house of tomorrow, which you cannot visit, not even in your dreams. You may strive to be like them, but seek not to make them like you. For life goes not backward nor tarries with yesterday. You are the bows from which your children as living arrows are sent forth. The archer sees the mark upon the path of the infinite, and He bends you with His might that His arrows may go swift and far. Let your bending in the archer's hand be for gladness; For even as he loves the arrow that flies, so He loves also the bow that is stable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pclayton Posted December 28, 2007 Report Share Posted December 28, 2007 Teach by example. They'll figure out the rest on their own. We are raising our kids as Catholic. When they leave the house they can make up their own minds. I don't believe a 13 y.o. is capable of 'choosing' a religion, unless they are exceptionally intelligent or worldly. Sure it would be nice to attend the baptisms of my grandkids, but I won't hang myself if it doesn't happen. I tend to be a Libertarian. I can't tell what my kids will be. Of all the things I have zero tolerance for in my house its racism. Stay out past your curfew, minor offense. Drink or smoke a little, more of an issue. Call someone a nigger or a wetback? I get medieval :angry: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sceptic Posted December 28, 2007 Author Report Share Posted December 28, 2007 Yeah, this is hard. Especially since some religions/belief systems involve the idea that all others are very wrong. Hopefully, your belief system is more enlightened so you can teach your child the value of your religion while also teaching your child that there are other ways to live. My issue with religion is one that, I never bothered to teach my own children anything about religion at all, and I feel that this is possibly not the best way, I also made a concious effort not to make some of my more radical views open to my kids, they probably know them as they are hard to disguise but I have never tried to force my opinions on my kids, (inadvertatly none of my children have a religious belief that I am aware of) whilst I have no interest in converting them to a religious belief, one thing I do think I have not been good at as a parent is making them aware of other peoples beliefs as I am now of the opinion that in the world as it is becoming, we all need to understand each others beliefs to become more tolerant of each other and that our own behaviours need to be adapted for modern day living i.e a good example being Muslims living in a country that does not practice or possibly recognise its religions laws and probably think some of its practices and attitudes are archaic to say the least This is not my view on politics or racism as polled Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sceptic Posted December 28, 2007 Author Report Share Posted December 28, 2007 wetback what is a wet back? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pclayton Posted December 28, 2007 Report Share Posted December 28, 2007 wetback what is a wet back? A derogatory term for a Hispanic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barmar Posted December 28, 2007 Report Share Posted December 28, 2007 Teach by example. They'll figure out the rest on their own. But if your "example" is that you go to Mass every Sunday or Synagogue every Saturday, and you drag them along, doesn't that influence them? They're naturally going to be more comfortable with the church they have more experience with. And the sermons they've listened to are the belief system they'll probably adopt. I'm not a religious person, but I was raised Jewish. So I have even less belief that Jesus was the Son of God than that there's a God at all. If forced to choose between Israel and Palestine, I'm biased towards Israel due to the cultural connection. When I went to Hebrew School, they taught us that Israel won the Six Day War fair and square, and they have a right to the territories they annexed (Sinai, Gaza, and the West Bank), and being the gullible child I was I bought into this. It's hard to shake beliefs like this that are embedded when one is young. It probably helped that my father was agnostic, despite having been raised in a pretty religious home. Although I found religious stories and practices fascinating, I was always more interested in science, and rationalism has allowed me to overcome the religious brainwashing. But that doesn't mean that I have to reject my heritage -- it's still the case that my "people" have been persecuted in many eras, and we mustn't forget things like the Holocaust. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barmar Posted December 28, 2007 Report Share Posted December 28, 2007 I feel like my parents didn't influence me much on politics/religion/racism (my grand father did). Am I deceiving myself?, Does everyone feel the same? Even if you haven't adopted their beliefs, that doesn't mean they didn't influence you. Sometimes the influence is the opposite -- rebelious kids may choose to go against what their parents believe. In other cases the influence may be more subtle. Or it may change over time ("Oh no, I've become my father!"). The point is that you observed them and likely discussed things with them over the course of many years during your childhood and teen years, and all that is in your subconscious memories. It's unlikely that it has had little effect on the person you grew into. Sure, your more distant relatives, friends, and the media have also had an impact. But you probably didn't spend as much time with any of them as you did with your parents (although it sounds like in your case your grandfather was probably there almost as much), so they can't have had as much of a concentrated effect on you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenrexford Posted December 28, 2007 Report Share Posted December 28, 2007 Do you think the world would be a better place if adults did not contaminate thier kids with thier own views on Religion, Politics and Racism I think I can make my point about how dumb this question actually is: Sure! I agree whole-heartedly. For that reason, I think that all parents, and I mean all parents, should have their children learn about the pros and cons of all positions. Some proposed activities: 1. Have a "Nazi-Klan Day," to allow your children to learn the intriguing message of the white supremacists.2. Spend some time discussing recruitment possibilities into your local radical terrorist group, maybe even a summer camp somewhere.3. Visit the Vatican in the afternoon, and then participate ina ritualistic animal sacrifice later that evening.4. Try to explain the shifting positions of American political parties without laughing. Stuff like that. Heck -- I say let's go even further! 5. Have a "get your necked picture on line day," to explore the exciting world of child pornography.6. Everyone loves Crack Saturdays!!!7. 16? Let's try out a hooker for the boy! Better make that two hookers, one of each sex, just to make sure.8. How about we beat up the homeless guy at 10:00 A.M., but then take him to the food shelter for lunch and volunteer there for the afternoon. Yes, expose the kiddies to all sides, and do not force your sick views on them by actually claiming a knowledge of right and wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EricK Posted December 28, 2007 Report Share Posted December 28, 2007 Nice rhetoric. But your examples are not actually examples of learning "about the pros and cons of all positions" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerben42 Posted December 28, 2007 Report Share Posted December 28, 2007 It's hard to shake beliefs like this that are embedded when one is young. It probably helped that my father was agnostic, despite having been raised in a pretty religious home. Although I found religious stories and practices fascinating, I was always more interested in science, and rationalism has allowed me to overcome the religious brainwashing. But that doesn't mean that I have to reject my heritage -- it's still the case that my "people" have been persecuted in many eras, and we mustn't forget things like the Holocaust. I was in the privileged position of not having a religious upbringing. Equally lucky my parents insisted that I would participate in the 2 hours a week of religion (Christian) class in primary school for cultural purposes. Not knowing much about it except for the stories (what else can you tell kids in school except for the stories) I was agnostic. It wasn't until college until I really actively looked into religion, and when I did I came to the conclusion that man created god, not the other way around. Some religions fundamentally believe that people from other religions can't go to heaven. that creates a much larger obstical to teaching your children pluralistic ideas... That wouldn't be terrible, where it gets bad is when they think they are responsible for getting me to heaven. I don't want to be saved, I'm quite happy the way I am thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.