pclayton Posted December 13, 2007 Report Share Posted December 13, 2007 If I read this table right, it says that NT will only take more tricks than spades about 1 out of 20 times? That seems incredible to me. yeah, but in NT you need 1 trick less :rolleyes: Obv <_< Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArtK78 Posted December 13, 2007 Report Share Posted December 13, 2007 That is not true. The scoring is match points. So you need to take the same number of tricks in notrump to succeed against those in spades. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted December 13, 2007 Report Share Posted December 13, 2007 well, there's a mix-up here. don't worry. rage on :rolleyes: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted December 13, 2007 Report Share Posted December 13, 2007 That's 55.3% of hands on which spades plays at least 1 trick better than NT. A ballpark estimate of the standard error is (.5)(.5)(sqrt(1/1000)) which is about 0.8%. So this is a very significant difference if you believe the setup. If I get your table right, you say:If you have a spade fit you score better in 55 % of the cases but worse in 45 %. You misread the table. He is saying when you have a spade fit, spades makes more tricks than notrump 55% of the time. But notrump makes more tricks than spades only 3% of the time, and they are the same 42% of the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benlessard Posted December 13, 2007 Report Share Posted December 13, 2007 Im sure that is a close call. Good declarer vs bad defenses is more likely to be able to steal a trick in Nt then in 4S. So against a weaker field the temptation to go for Nt is higher. Defender will sometimes blow a trick on lead or unable to avoid some endplay. Often the hand is in S always make 5 but in nt you have to do some work to make 5. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han Posted December 13, 2007 Report Share Posted December 13, 2007 Seems clear to use the gadget. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Codo Posted December 14, 2007 Report Share Posted December 14, 2007 That's 55.3% of hands on which spades plays at least 1 trick better than NT. A ballpark estimate of the standard error is (.5)(.5)(sqrt(1/1000)) which is about 0.8%. So this is a very significant difference if you believe the setup. If I get your table right, you say:If you have a spade fit you score better in 55 % of the cases but worse in 45 %. You misread the table. He is saying when you have a spade fit, spades makes more tricks than notrump 55% of the time. But notrump makes more tricks than spades only 3% of the time, and they are the same 42% of the time. If I make the same number of tricks, NT scores significant better at mps. So 55:45 is still correct. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.