ArtK78 Posted December 15, 2007 Report Share Posted December 15, 2007 Last night I did a simulation (5000 hands) with the 12-14 hand holding 1 to 3 spades, 2 to 4 hearts, 2 to 4 diamonds and 4 or 5 clubs. It appeared that there was not much difference between 1NT and 2S if partner would never raise 1S with a 3-card spade support. Obviously the more partner raises 1S with 3-card support, the more 1NT becomes the superior contract. That simulation supports my experience. In my parnerships, we raise on 3 card support with any excuse. So we often pass the 1NT rebid with a 5 card spade suit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neilkaz Posted December 15, 2007 Author Report Share Posted December 15, 2007 Last night I did a simulation (5000 hands) with the 12-14 hand holding 1 to 3 spades, 2 to 4 hearts, 2 to 4 diamonds and 4 or 5 clubs. It appeared that there was not much difference between 1NT and 2S if partner would never raise 1S with a 3-card spade support. Obviously the more partner raises 1S with 3-card support, the more 1NT becomes the superior contract. That simulation supports my experience. In my parnerships, we raise on 3 card support with any excuse. So we often pass the 1NT rebid with a 5 card spade suit. My dad commonly raised with 3 card support and absolutely hated if I rebid a 5 card major in this situation and especially since we played MP and he was hoping 1NT might take 8 or even 9 tricks if the defence wasn't spot on or the cards were lucky. He never bought the arguement that 2♠ outscores 1NT since 8 tricks and NT outscores 8 at ♠. Most of my current PD's hate giving and receiving 3 card support and if playing with them, I'd prefer to make the same 2♠ rebid that I made with the text hand, especially if we discussed to try really hard to avoid rebidding 1NT with a stiff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.