MickyB Posted December 2, 2007 Report Share Posted December 2, 2007 [hv=d=s&s=saxxxhjdak98xc98x]133|100|Scoring: XIMP1D:1H1S:2C2D:2S??[/hv] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulg Posted December 2, 2007 Report Share Posted December 2, 2007 3♦. Just move along please, nothing to see here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerben42 Posted December 2, 2007 Report Share Posted December 2, 2007 Question 1: Was 2♣ GF? Yes: Bid 3♣ now, planning to play 3NT opposite 3 small. No: Go to question 2. Question 2: Was 2♠ GF? I would say no in this case, so I now... PASS. Partner's hand might be: ♠Kxx♥AQxxx♦x♣Qxxx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skjaeran Posted December 2, 2007 Report Share Posted December 2, 2007 Partner is making a slam invite. On the negative side:I'm close to minimum in high card strenght.My trumps are poor. On the positive side:I've got 5 controls.I've got a decent side suit.I've got i kicker in partners suit. All in all I've got a better than minimum hand and will cooperate in slam exploration. Now it's down to agreements how to do that. Some would go on describing shape (3♣), some would cuebid (3♦) and some would show concentration of strength (3♦). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han Posted December 3, 2007 Report Share Posted December 3, 2007 I would pattern out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenrexford Posted December 3, 2007 Report Share Posted December 3, 2007 Partner is making a slam invite. On the negative side:I'm close to minimum in high card strenght.My trumps are poor. On the positive side:I've got 5 controls.I've got a decent side suit.I've got i kicker in partners suit. All in all I've got a better than minimum hand and will cooperate in slam exploration. Now it's down to agreements how to do that. Some would go on describing shape (3♣), some would cuebid (3♦) and some would show concentration of strength (3♦). Agree 100%. For me, though, I'd bid 2NT, denying two of the top three spades. After 3♣ by partner (the only call where it matters), I can bid 3♦ to show two of the top three honors in diamonds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted December 3, 2007 Report Share Posted December 3, 2007 Hi, 3D, a cue, intending to bid 4Dand to pass 4S, if I ever get thechance. With kind regardsMarlowe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.