Jump to content

1h-p-2nt, what do SAYC partners actually mean?


MomoTheDog

Recommended Posts

Lots of people put a bare SAYC in their system card, but what does the average "intermediate/advanced" player mean when they bid 2nt over a partner's 1h?

 

I know the standard system says that this is Jacoby, but is the Jacoby 2nt absolutely universal for a standard pick-up SAYC partner? It's very tiring to be told off for misinterpreting their 2nt bids.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I see it, according to the ACBL SAYC booklet, 1M-2NT is a forcing raise.

 

But then, 1m-2NT is 13-15 and almost NO-ONE actually plays it that way (10/11 is far more common).

 

Without making a specific agreement, you're just guessing. I'd probably ASSUME something like 10/11 balanced is the norm. It's wrong, but it's the norm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots of people put a bare SAYC in their system card, but what does the average "intermediate/advanced" player mean when they bid 2nt over a partner's 1h?

 

I know the standard system says that this is Jacoby, but is the Jacoby 2nt absolutely universal for a standard pick-up SAYC partner? It's very tiring to be told off for misinterpreting their 2nt bids.

Most players learn Jacoby 2N fairly early in their Bridge life.

 

If a player is not playing J2N, then "the book" definition of 1M-2N depends on whether you are playing with someone from NA or if they are from mainland Europe.

 

In NA, the "natural" meaning of 1M-2N is a balanced minimum opening bid, say

12-14 HCP or 13-15 playing points, usually w/o 4 card support unless in a 4333.

 

Most Europeans would consider "natural" for 1M-2N to be an Invitational hand, say ~10-11 HCP or ~11-12 playing points. Again, usually w/o 4 card support unless in a 4333.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe this sounds pedantic, but the ACBL summary of SAYC (January 2006) says 1M-2N is Jacoby, so it's Jacoby. SAYC is well-defined, which is its strength.

 

Let's play it as defined, and educate those who play it incorrectly. Maybe there should be a category like "Strict SAYC".

 

Does this sound too idealistic?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I play SAYC online with a pickup partner, many of whom don't use the inside of the convention card bids, if I don't see Jacoby 2nt in the notes on the front page, then I ask before the game starts if 1 major 2nt is Jacoby raise or if instead it means 11-12 and promises 2 in the suit in case opener has a 6 card major or I ask if P is using the bids and responses on the inside of the convention card and go by that answer. I have avoided many disasters by asking one of those questions.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...