Jump to content

another who's to blame


who's to blame?  

34 members have voted

  1. 1. who's to blame?

    • N
      2
    • S
      18
    • methods
      11
    • S declarer play
      1
    • bad luck
      2


Recommended Posts

The 1S overcall is fine, not "crap" or "junk". I would play change of suit as nf, or better still as a Rubens advance as has already been posted here.

The 1 overcall is refuse, flotsam, garbage, waste, crud, fecal matter, and all that. Otherwise, a good call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 1S overcall is fine, not "crap" or "junk". I would play change of suit as nf, or better still as a Rubens advance as has already been posted here.

The 1 overcall is refuse, flotsam, garbage, waste, crud, fecal matter, and all that. Otherwise, a good call.

Hmm. Does that mean you don't like it Ken? Would hate to suggest coprophilic tendencies. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

methods. play rubens advances.

Agree. Easy stop in 2.

Even playing rubens advance, shouldn't north bid once more after 2 and 2 by south? Transfer and pass will show a weak hand in rubens as i know.

 

I know some people play advancer's new suit forcing after overcaller's 2 level overcall, but not forcing after 1 level overcall. The reasons are obvious, 1 level overcall may be junk, but 2 level overcall normally much sounder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

methods. play rubens advances.

Agree. Easy stop in 2.

Even playing rubens advance, shouldn't north bid once more after 2 and 2 by south? Transfer and pass will show a weak hand in rubens as i know.

That really depends on your overcalling style. If partner could have something like the OP south hand or a minimum not much better than that, I think you should pass the 2 transfer completion. If your minimum for an overcall is better than that, the T is a great card that should prompt a raise to 3.

 

In addition what you consider a minimum for bidding 2 influence your decision over 2 from partner. If you can bid it on "rubbish" you can't pass 2 with this. If 2 promise an invitiational (or close to that) hand you should pass 2 with this hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why play Rubens advances when you have to be inv+ to do so? Doesn't it kinda defeat the purpose of playing it? :P

 

I mean.. in that case you could just bid the suits naturally, F1, no?

Why ever so?

Playing it inv+ allows you to stop at 2 in your suit when partner doesn't accept your invite. Whereas natF1 doesn't.

Btw, I didn't advocate playing it inv+.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...