asc Posted October 7, 2007 Report Share Posted October 7, 2007 1♦ we can miss a slam just with - Ax xxxx Axx xxxx ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han Posted October 7, 2007 Report Share Posted October 7, 2007 I like 2♦, it makes it more likely that I will be able to bid spades next. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbforster Posted October 10, 2007 Report Share Posted October 10, 2007 People's desire to bid with hands like this remind me of why I like to play 2 suited weak two bids. At least this way you have a system bid for hands like this, instead of fudging (a lot in this case) to open 1♦ or 1♠. I think many of the passers would make weak descriptive bid if it was available - 2♦ = 5+♦, 4+ major, 4-10 points Twice as likely as a weak 2 in diamonds, and safer in terms of finding law level fits too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted October 10, 2007 Report Share Posted October 10, 2007 Why is 2♦ not an option? If it's multi, then 2♠ probably shows a two-suiter and becomes an option. Assuming 2♦ is Fl'ry or Benji or some such, I'll try 1♦. Now Han should tell me that 1♦ is ridicolous, it would make him feel good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.