Jump to content

2/1 question


ochinko

Recommended Posts

It's a close call in my view. Do you want to force to game or not? The heart suit is not exactly great, but it's likely the last chance to get hearts in if we have a 5-3 fit. Being non-vulnerable at IMPs I think I will settle for 1NT. Maybe I can catch up later if partner's rebid requires action.

 

The only rebid I will pass is 2, and then I am quite happy that I did not force to game. I am sure partner can have hands where game is a fair shot even if he rebids his spades, but I am not too worried.

 

Vulnerable I would have gone for 2. This is how close it is as far as I am concerned.

 

Roland

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 for me...

 

Sure its a 12 count. However, this has two bullets and a King. The stiff Ace would normally be bad news, but if its opposite partner's suit it (should) be supporting some honors.

 

(Plus I have a sound opening across from me)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm doubling. You have to get in there low. 2 is wrong.

Huh? I'm bidding 2, doubling isn't an option.

 

No, seriously, not only is double not an option, it's not even a legal call. :)

 

(I assume Phil was joking?)

ROFL; yes of course. Although I do confuse RHO with my partner a lot (they both make my life difficult :P )

 

If pard opened 1, I'd try 1N.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Game force it. I feel really strongly that all close calls in a 2/1 system should just game force. The system strength is when you are in a GF. The system weakness is when you have about inv values and have to go through 1N. This leads me to believe close calls should just go through the GF, even if it's not QUITE worth it. Just as an example it will be very tough to bid slams accurately if you start with 1N, and it will be very hard to find 5-3 heart fits when you belong in 4H.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I G/F it as well; bidding a forcing NT leads to some awkward sequences where pard rebids in their 3 card minor on a 5-3-(xx) hand and miss 4 versus the SAYC bidders. That, and I have decent controls for a change...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is one of the reasons why I dislike Jacoby 2NT -- I liked an old alternative I used to play. The alternative, after a 1 opening, was for 2NT to show GF values and 5+ hearts. 1-P-2 was then invitational only, with 5+ hearts, non-forcing (no spade fit). Or, reverse the "which is GF" meaning, if you will.

 

It was, admittedly, used as a solution for a canape approach problem, but the auctions seemed to work very well, especially when Opener held a weak, balanced hand and could pass 2 as the right call.

 

The 2NT GF does jump us up a bit, but not really that much, as practice showed that the number of occurrences of two 5-card major suits and no fit in either was relatively rare. Canape may have protected some of Opener's rebid issues, perhaps. I never tried it in the context of a standard/natural approach, but I always have wanted to try it.

 

Barring that alternative, I think I'll GF this and end up in trouble on occasion. Thank God that I and my partner can pull in silly 3NT contracts with uncanny frequency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having a game forcing 2NT response to show hearts seems terrible to me. You remove opener's easy 2 and 2NT rebid options, which seems impossible to recover from.

Yeah -- that's the part I could never work out with standard. With the canape approach I used, Opener either had four spades and a longer second suit (he'd complete the canape), or 6+ spades (3), or a balanced minimum with 4-5 spades and 3+ hearts (raise hearts). 3NT meant something also, but I cannot remember what.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with ken: I'll GF this hand. Unfortunately, all of my partners play Jacoby 2NT. I'll bid 2H and hope this is not the unlikely hand where only 1NT (or something else equally silly) makes. :P
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Game force it. I feel really strongly that all close calls in a 2/1 system should just game force. The system strength is when you are in a GF. The system weakness is when you have about inv values and have to go through 1N. This leads me to believe close calls should just go through the GF, even if it's not QUITE worth it. Just as an example it will be very tough to bid slams accurately if you start with 1N, and it will be very hard to find 5-3 heart fits when you belong in 4H.

This is the everyday's history, If you bid undisciplined 2/1 you also lose some of the advantages of being in GF since your range becomes too wide and inaccurate.

 

I don't care about losing a 5-3 heart fit when the 5 card suit is poor, we could make 3NT running only spade tricks and minor tops. 1NT for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Playing 2/1 GF, this is obviously a very close call. However, if you play BART, you are better placed after a 1NT response as you have a method to uncover a 5 card heart suit with just under game forcing values.

 

With my regular partner I play BART and I play that 1-2 is not game forcing. So, this hand is an easy 2 call. BART is reserved for hands of slightly less strength with hearts or some other awkward game-invitational hands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The hand in question is nowhere near as strong as, for example, x AJ10xx Kxxx Axx.

 

I would not gf with this. 1N. Then, over 2 anything (other than 2), I bid 2N.

 

We may still back into a 5-3 heart fit if he rebids 2minor, since with all 5341 or 5314 hands and accepting values, he will bid 3 along the way. We will miss the heart fit when he is 5332 or 5323... and, usually, when he has a 6 card spade suit.

 

This is a very close call, but the stiff A, even in partner's suit, is not pulling full weight, and the 5 card suit is weak... these are both warnings to downgrade, and I would ignore one, with this hand, but not two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We may still back into a 5-3 heart fit if he rebids 2minor, since with all 5341 or 5314 hands and accepting values, he will bid 3 along the way.

It's the "with accepting values part" that worries me. If partner has a 53(41) 11 or 12 count I'd rather play 4H than 2N.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...