xx1943 Posted September 16, 2007 Report Share Posted September 16, 2007 [hv=d=n&v=n&n=saqt4h3da6cq76542&s=sk97haqj42djckt83]133|200|Scoring: IMP[/hv] West North East South - 1♣ Pass 1♥ Pass 1♠ Pass 2♦ Pass 3♣ Pass 4♦ Pass 5♦ Pass 5♥ Pass 6♦ Pass 6NT Dbl Pass Pass Pass Hi all, My partner and I bid the hand like shown. 2♦ was game-forcing.He thought the 4♦ bid as splinter. I thought it showed a big red 2-suiter. 1) What do you thinks is 4♦?2) How do you distribute the blame?3) Would 4♣ instead of 4♦ have been RKCB? (we play 4!C as RKCB in any forcing situation, where trumps are agreed explicitly or implicitly) Many thanks for your answers Al Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han Posted September 16, 2007 Report Share Posted September 16, 2007 North, 4D is a splinter and seems a good bid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han Posted September 16, 2007 Report Share Posted September 16, 2007 3) Would 4♣ instead of 4♦ have been RKCB? (we play 4!C as RKCB in any forcing situation, where trumps are agreed explicitly or implicitly) No, trumps were not yet agreed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cherdano Posted September 16, 2007 Report Share Posted September 16, 2007 To be honest, if you have to ask 3) then you shouldn't be playing Minorwood. If you can't make a clear rule and stick to it then you will lose a lot by many misunderstandings (and no, "4m is always minorwood if natural and forcing" is not a good rule, at least "4m is never minorwood" is a better one). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skjaeran Posted September 16, 2007 Report Share Posted September 16, 2007 3♦ would be natural and forcing (ie a strong red 2-suiter), thus 4♦ is a splinter agreeing clubs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike777 Posted September 16, 2007 Report Share Posted September 16, 2007 Both 100%You seem to have not discussed and agreed with partner what or when a splinter or rkc bid is? A partner needs to make sure not only that they know and understand the convention but that their partner does also. :P Bridge is a partnership game, you need to make sure not only you know what you are playing but that your partner knows also... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted September 16, 2007 Report Share Posted September 16, 2007 Hi, 1) Splinter, 3D instead of 2D would show a GF 2-suiter, but if you are not sure, that partner gets it, just bid 4C Personnally I believe South needs some sign of cooperation from North, and since 4C is RKCB, 4D as a splinter is best2) North, 4D is a splinter3) in view of your agreements, 4C would be RKCB for clubs, how else do you agree clubs in a forcing auction after 4th suit I prefer it as natural forward going, but this is a matter of style With kind regardsMarlowe PS: Having read the arguments of the other posters,I agree, that it is a partnership problem, i.e South isas well to blame Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdonn Posted September 16, 2007 Report Share Posted September 16, 2007 I prefer to play 3♦ over 1♠ is natural 5-5 game forcing, but I believe standard (assuming 4th suit forcing to game) is that auction is invitational, 2♦ then 3♦ natural and game forcing. So yes 4♦ is a splinter. To the other question, I can't imagine playing 4♣ as keycard there in any effective manner. If you want to play that south can set trumps with 4♣ and north could then bid keycard with 4♦, well it's not my favorite but it is playable. Just a small digression. Everyone I know in southern California would make a strong jump shift on south's hand to 2♥, then bid 3♦ to show hearts, club support, and diamond shortness. This would easily let north bid 4♣ to set trumps and keycard next. It is a method that comes up more than you would think, especially given the regional style to do it on any game force that would make slam if the hands fit well, and it tends to do very well when it occurs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han Posted September 16, 2007 Report Share Posted September 16, 2007 Both 100%You seem to have not discussed and agreed with partner what or when a splinter or rkc bid is? A partner needs to make sure not only that they know and understand the convention but that their partner does also. :P Bridge is a partnership game, you need to make sure not only you know what you are playing but that your partner knows also... If your point is that south needs to be blamed for playing with north then I agree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han Posted September 16, 2007 Report Share Posted September 16, 2007 Hmm, I like methods that come up a lot and tend to do well when they come up. Maybe I should move to Southern California. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Codo Posted September 17, 2007 Report Share Posted September 17, 2007 Yes 4 ♦ was a splinter4 ♣ had been agreeing clubs but it is not clear whether it is forcing in your system or just a place to play when pd denies a diamond control. I really love minorwood as: 4 Club/diamond in an uncotested auction are never to play and it is always asking for KCs. (obvious exceptions are cuebids or splinters) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.