gwnn Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 Unfavorable IMPs LHO deals and opens 2♦. Partner doubles. What's your plan with [hv=d=w&v=e&s=saqtxxxhkxxxdcktx]133|100|Scoring: IMP[/hv] ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 6sp. Alternatively 3di, followed by 3sp if p responds 3he, and some cuebids. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the hog Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 What is the 2D opening? Multi, weak 2, mini Roman, Benjamin????I assume you mean a weak 2. If so, I bid 3D. Over 3H/3S you have a variety of options - Exclusion Bw, a 4D cue. The exact sequence depends a lot on whom your pd is. I would never bid 6S unless playing with a weak pick up pd Helene. You are cold for a grand opposite many possible layouts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted September 11, 2007 Author Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 weak 2 in diamonds, sorry for being vague bonus question: partner bids 3NT over 3♦. Now what? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hrothgar Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 RHO was unable to find a Diamond raise. This almost guaruntees that partner is sitting on a NT oriented hand that is too strong for an immediate 1NT Slam seems almost certain. A grand is well within the realm of possibility. We need as much bidding space as possible to determine strain and then start exploring controls. 3♦ looks like a reasonable start. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike777 Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 3d easy so far May miss the grand, my next bids are going to be very difficult Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 2♦ openerz pwnz joo!! ^^ 3♠ if I'm 100% sure it would be forcing3♦ otherwise Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keylime Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 3D is a solid start. After pard's surprising 3NT I would cuebid again and see what they do with it. I expect pard to not have necessarily denied a 4 card major here. 7 is starting to look super. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vang Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 3♦ for now. I hate the unexpected 3NT rebid by part... he has no 4 card major and is stronger than immediate 2NT overcall? I'm not sure how to continue, I'm not too worried by grand but on which small slam to play, 6♠ or 6NT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 3♦-3NT4♦-anything that is not 4M5♠ or 3♦-3NT4♦-4M5♦ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 I don't think that partner has a hand that it too strong for a direct 2NT bid, with that hand partner would have bid 4NT now. I'd say that partner is more likely 3-3-2-5 with Kx of diamonds. Anyway, agree with 4D. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hrothgar Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 I don't think that partner has a hand that it too strong for a direct 2NT bid, with that hand partner would have bid 4NT now. I'd say that partner is more likely 3-3-2-5 with Kx of diamonds. If partner has that hand, then the opponents have an 11 card Diamond fit. Lets assume that LHO has six Diamonds for his 2♦ opening. Do you really think that RHO is passing with 5 card Diamond support? I know that there are some hands where you deliberately bury a big fit hoping that the opponents go awry. This might be one of those times. However, I think that this is less likely than then big NT oriented hand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 I don't think that partner has a hand that it too strong for a direct 2NT bid, with that hand partner would have bid 4NT now. I'd say that partner is more likely 3-3-2-5 with Kx of diamonds. If partner has that hand, then the opponents have an 11 card Diamond fit. Slets assume that LHO has six Diamonds for his 2♦ opening. Do you really think that RHO is passing with 5 card Diamond support? I know that there are some hands where you deliberately bury a big fit hoping that the opponents go awry. This might be one of those times. However, I think that this is less likely than then big NT oriented hand. I agree with you Richard, at least one person at the table has made an unusual call. But I don't think that 3NT in this auction should show a balanced monster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.