Jump to content

Jxxxx-Qxxxxx-x-x


kgr

Recommended Posts

MP's, N dealer, all green

You have :

Jxxxx-Qxxxxx-x-x

And partner opens 1NT and RHO passes.

You have following agreements:

1) Transfer to H. Rem: You can't show a weak 5/5 because 2C is a relay to 2D and you show other hands afterwards. If you don't want to invite then you have to transfer (partner will break the transfer with a 4 card).

2) 1NT-2H-2S-3H : 5/5 invite (partner only bids 2S with less then 4 spades).

3) 1NT-4D : 5/5 GF and no slem interest

(I don't remember the actual hand - getting old :) - but it was a 5-6 with 3 HCP).

 

Will you bid different at IMP's?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way you play 2 2 2, which is not how I normally do, that seems like a fine choice. Since you are playing it a one round force I can always show a 6th heart next round. Under normal circumstances I would have bid stayman, raising 2 to 4, 2 to 3, and simply bidding 2 over 2, which is perhaps a bit wimpy.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

MP's, N dealer, all green

You have :

Jxxxx-Qxxxxx-x-x

And partner opens 1NT and RHO passes.

You have following agreements:

1) Transfer to H. Rem: You can't show a weak 5/5 because 2C is a relay to 2D and you show other hands afterwards. If you don't want to invite then you have to transfer (partner will break the transfer with a 4 card).

2) 1NT-2H-2S-3H : 5/5 invite (partner only bids 2S with less then 4 spades).

3) 1NT-4D : 5/5 GF and no slem interest

(I don't remember the actual hand - getting old  :(  - but it was a 5-6 with 3 HCP).

 

Will you bid different at IMP's?

edit...I guess we do not play stayman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MP's, N dealer, all green

You have :

Jxxxx-Qxxxxx-x-x

And partner opens 1NT and RHO passes.

You have following agreements:

1) Transfer to H. Rem: You can't show a weak 5/5 because 2C is a relay to 2D and you show other hands afterwards. If you don't want to invite then you have to transfer (partner will break the transfer with a 4 card).

2) 1NT-2H-2S-3H : 5/5 invite (partner only bids 2S with less then 4 spades).

3) 1NT-4D : 5/5 GF and no slem interest

(I don't remember the actual hand - getting old  :(  - but it was a 5-6 with 3 HCP).

 

Will you bid different at IMP's?

I stayman....

 

if pard bids 2d I bid a nonforcing 2H

 

Nothing fancy.

Do you just blatantly disregard that OP says this is not an option for a reason?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't seem to be too far wrong to start with 2D.

 

We have at most half the deck and there is a lot of shape, at least in my hand. I expect that my 2D call will bring, on my left, a double, or 2NT, or maybe a 3 level bid in the minors. And then partner will do what? But if lho passes my 2D and partner bids 2H and rho passes, I guess I will leave sleeping dogs lie i.e. I'll pass. Someone must have some minors, and with opps passing I guess it's pard, and I'll give up. If lho doubles 2D, followed by passes, so pard has two hearts only, then 2S sounds attractive. If pard bids 2H over the X of 2D, then things are looking up but being a pessimistic sort I will still pass. Shape is shape, but J-Q is still just a Jack and a Queen. I'll compete to 3H though (after 2D-X-2H) if they continue in diamonds. And do maximal doubles apply after 2D-X-2H-3D? It would be nice if they did so that 3H is unambiguously merely competitive. Something to discuss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the answers.

I did bid 2 and partner did bid 2 (denying 4 card ). 2 was passed out.

Opps did lead a and 2 made +2. We would make 5 on a lead.

I don't know partner's exact hand.

...I know partner had only 15HCP, so I guess he had something like : AQTx-Kxx-AQx-xxx with K well positioned and 's 2-2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd probably try an invitational sequence with both majors at MPs, but try a 4 signoff (via Texas or whatever) at IMPs.

 

do maximal doubles apply after 2D-X-2H-3D? It would be nice if they did so that 3H is unambiguously merely competitive.  Something to discuss.

I've played both sequences

 

1N-2D-(X)-2H-(3D) and

1N-2H-(X)-2S-(3H)

 

as maximal double situations in my regular partnerships. Seems reasonable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...