Jump to content

Recommended Posts

<!-- ONEHAND begin --><table border='1'> <tr> <td> <table> <tr> <td> Dealer: </td> <td> West </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Vul: </td> <td> N/S </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Scoring: </td> <td> IMP </td> </tr> </table> </td> <td> <table> <tr> <th> <span class='spades'> ♠ </span> </th> <td> A854 </td> </tr> <tr> <th> <span class='hearts'> ♥ </span> </th> <td>  </td> </tr> <tr> <th> <span class='diamonds'> ♦ </span> </th> <td> AT952 </td> </tr> <tr> <th> <span class='clubs'> ♣ </span> </th> <td> 9752 </td> </tr> </table> </td> <td> W N E S

1 1 2 2

4 X P P

XX P P ? </td> </tr> </table><!-- ONEHAND end -->

 

Do you run or pass?

Any reason behind?

I do not understand I bid 2s with this hand? Why not 4H the first time?

I do wonder how partner can double 4H when I may have zero defensive tricks or maybe 1/2 of one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dealer: West
Vul: N/S
Scoring: IMP
A854
[space]
AT952
9752
W N E S

1 1 2 2

4 X P P

XX P P ?

 

Do you run or pass?

Any reason behind?

I know I'm not the average person here, but I will happily bid 2 with 0 defensive tricks, and I think most people will do it with one. I have two. Even minus one for the heart void, I still have as much as partner could reasonably hope for me to have. I'm passing. Heck, the X to me implies a 4 card overcall with heart length, so partner's screaming for me to NOT bid 4.

 

This is kind of odd, since, I'd be seriously tempted to bid 4 directly over 2. But for some reason I sandbagged, and now it's paid off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The difficulty is that you seriously misbid your hand with the 2S call last round. Your hand was worth bidding game in spades, and arguably worth 4H (splinter).

 

You have given yourself an impossible problem by bidding 2S, which showed a very different type of hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PS: I agree, that 2S is an underbid, take away

both Aces and 2S is still right.

 

No, take away both aces and you have to bid 3 (this is not invitational in a competetive auction)

 

It's hard to think of a hand that would bid 2 with this distribution. Maybe a really quacky one (Quack = Queen or Jack).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, take away both aces and you have to bid 3 (this is not invitational in a competetive auction)

Wrong vul, wrong placement. After the meager 2 raise, you have to assume partner's got some hearts, and probably a slow trick or two there. Even if they have game, -500 is going to be bad.

 

Otherwise, I would agree. At any rate, this hand should have gone for game the first time. Now, I'll take the 1000.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I way underbid the first time with 2, and now it's paid off !! Bridge is funny in that sometimes your mistakes turn out well for you and this is one of those times.

 

I can't imagine what XX was based on, maybe a spade void, but I still have an Ace, and partner's got a good hand with a big surprise for declarer in trumps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would also have been in a spade game long time ago, but as the auction progressed maybe I should be glad that I did not bid at the 4-level. It seems like partner has wasted values in hearts, so passing now is clear.

 

Advancer promised zero on defence and is looking at two tricks opposite a partner who penalised them in 4. What more can you ask for?

 

Roland

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you run or pass?

Run from what?

I don't expect them to make, so I'll pass happily.

WOW! Most people except Justin (hehe) don't make random redoubles. Are you saying the opponents are insane? If people started doing that I would have to reevaluate, but in real life they just don't. I think this auction has gone great, now I get doubled in 4 which is what I would have wanted all along. Seems like 2 was sand bagging and 4 last round would have completed the plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you saying the opponents are insane?

Not really, but ......

it's either that or partner is deliberately ending this partnership.

I think they are a bit insane, yes. At least on BBO, I see redoubles like this with some regularity (not frequency, mind you, but sometimes they do occur).

 

I really don't know what motivates them. I think however it's an emotional and not a logical motivation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It really depends on my pard and my opponents.

 

If I trusted my pard, I'm not running. If I trust neither I bid 4.

 

If I trust my LHO more than my pard, I'm wondering why I'm playing with the guy across the table and not my LHO :blink:

 

If I trust both, this auction doesn't exist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I trust both, this auction doesn't exist.

I think it's RHO that's fooling around. LHO is expecting 3 hearts and an 8 count, and in fact RHO has 2 hearts and a 3 count. The vulnerability is such that RHO may have felt it was safe to get cute.

 

Edited to add:

LHO has something like:

x

AKJ8xx

KJx

AKx

 

or slightly less, which looks absolutely unbeatable across a constructive raise.

 

When partner shows up with

 

KQJx

QT9xx

Qxx

x

 

And dummy

Txxx

xx

xx

QJTxx

 

LHO is not happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have bid 4 on my first call to put the opps to the last guess.

 

Here, I think PD has 5 H or 4 and honors stacked behind opener.

 

I have two aces, the surely cashes and inspite of the xx, the may cash.

 

I respect PD and pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you run or pass?

Run from what?

I don't expect them to make, so I'll pass happily.

WOW! Most people except Justin (hehe) don't make random redoubles. Are you saying the opponents are insane? If people started doing that I would have to reevaluate, but in real life they just don't. I think this auction has gone great, now I get doubled in 4 which is what I would have wanted all along. Seems like 2 was sand bagging and 4 last round would have completed the plan.

I agree on that for sure, but most people don't make random(insane?) penalty double facing a partner who hasn't promised any defence either. So I'll trust my partner. I'd obviously had bid more previously, but can't be sure we're making game. As JTF I expect RHO to be the culprit on this occasion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guessed right, LHO was off his rocker...

 

[hv=d=w&v=e&n=sk762hq865dk6cat8&w=sjthakj73dj873ckj&e=sq93ht942dq4cq643&s=sa854hdat952c9752]399|300|Scoring: IMP[/hv]

 

The problem is that I was intimidated by these redoubles too often, and tend to think about running too much, hence the subtitle "whether there's any logic" to deal with these nonsense...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is not just LHO who is nuts Jim, your partner is as well. He does not have an overcall, and he sure as hell does not have a double of 4H.

Agree. Doing 4-card overcalls myself on occasion I'd have to say bidding on this north hand wouldn't occur to me. Neither should it to anyone else. If forced to make a call other than pass I'd double, not that it's my style to double on this. The double of 4 is pretty looney. As to west's actions I'm speechless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is not just LHO who is nuts Jim, your partner is as well. He does not have an overcall, and he sure as hell does not have a double of 4H.

lol, West redoubled because he had all the Jacks, North overcalled on a ridiculous four card suit, and South only raised to 2 with 4 pieces and a void in opp's suit and two Aces. East was the only one who "had his bid" (although South had it and quite a bit more).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...