navit Posted July 25, 2007 Report Share Posted July 25, 2007 My partner opened 1 H with 6 H With K and 4 D. He only had 9 Hcp. I responded 2D with 3 card support, 4d and 13 Hcp. He then rebid 2 H. the final contract was 4 H which me made.Was his opening bid correct? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted July 25, 2007 Report Share Posted July 25, 2007 If you'd give us the complete hand we may be able to judge if his opening was right or not. K-Kxxxxx-xxxx-QJ is an awful holding, while x-Kxxxxx-AQxx-xx is a way better 9 pointer... So I can't judge at the moment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scoob Posted July 25, 2007 Report Share Posted July 25, 2007 according to the hands database: ♠Q986 ♥K97653 ♦K ♣J8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted July 25, 2007 Report Share Posted July 25, 2007 My partner opened 1 H with 6 H With K and 4 D. He only had 9 Hcp. I responded 2D with 3 card support, 4d and 13 Hcp. He then rebid 2 H. the final contract was 4 H which me made.Was his opening bid correct? Hi, at first glance, I would say no, but it dependson the system you are playing and partnershipagreement. Assuming a pickup partner, this would wouldmore or less imply standard american, and I would say, that the hand is to weak for a system,where a 2/1 bid promises another bid, assumingyou and your partner know, that a 2/1 bid promisesanother bid, but it is a guess. With kind regardsMarlowe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenrexford Posted July 25, 2007 Report Share Posted July 25, 2007 "Was his bid correct?" That depends upon style and partnership agreements. What I can say is that I personally approve of and use a style where a 9-count 6♥/4♦ hand can be opened with a concentration of good values in the two suits. I would not hesitate, personally, to open ♠xx ♥AQxxxx ♦Kxxx ♣x. I'd prefer a ten ot two, or some nice 8's and 9's, but I admittedly would not care that much. I also would want the Ace or King in the diamond suit; otherwise 2♥ might look more appealing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted July 25, 2007 Report Share Posted July 25, 2007 Marty Bergen recomends the rule of twenty: length in the two longest suits plus HCPs must be at least twenty. Thus, 11+6+4=19 is not enough. But with the values concentrated in the two long suits and at least one ten I would open. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArtK78 Posted July 25, 2007 Report Share Posted July 25, 2007 Was this a correct opening bid? NO. Much too light. I play light opening bids nonvul and this is still not a 1 bid. I don't even understand why posters are saying "It depends upon this or that..." If you play that an opening 1 bid in a major promises 6-10 HCP, then it is a fine opening bid. But I suspect that is not the case. I suspect that 4H was a lucky make. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mycroft Posted July 26, 2007 Report Share Posted July 26, 2007 In Nashville, third seat, I thought a 6-count was a (real, non-psychic) 1S opener. We play light, but not insanely light (decent 11) openers. The opponents didn't even blink. Of course, the hand was AJTxx T987xx Jx --. I've seen 9-counts that are much better than my average minimum opener - I open them. Having said that, a 9-count with a stiff K is a 6+count, and had better be a bomb. Michael. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neilkaz Posted July 27, 2007 Report Share Posted July 27, 2007 according to the hands database: ♠Q986 ♥K97653 ♦K ♣J8 What a rubbish opening this is ! After passing and opposite your 13 HCP and 3♥ you'll likely find 4♥ anyhow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.