Jump to content

Opening Lead against slam


Recommended Posts

 

__

842

AKQ942

7542

 

Holding this as West, you hear the following:

North deals and opens 1, and South bids 2.

North raises to 3, and South bids 4NT, regular Blackwood.

North bids 5 to show one Ace, and South bids 6.

 

Your opponents are very good players.

 

It's your lead. Any ideas ? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The hero lead is the 9... suit preference :)

 

The hero bid is double followed by the 9 B)

 

But, staying a little closer to reality, the odds are overwhelming that partner will know what to do if he wins the Jack.

 

I think it was one of the WC Polish players who, in a major championship recently, underled a similar holding, losing to the J. Partner held an inevitable winner, so the hero lead lost the slam swing.

 

Here, a good RHO has a stiff diamond. It would not be the least bit surprising to find that RHO was assuming that he had a source of tricks in spades, and the bad break may well beat him.

 

Having identified the hero lead, it will come as no surprise that I lead the ]K.

 

 

Sorry partner, but as one of my favourite bridge cartoons has it: I'm not good enough to be brilliant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

North is 5/4 or better in the majors, and south has at least 4 trumps.

South must have at least 5 for his bid, and North is permitted to raise with 3. North could have a minimal balanced hand with 5. After all, he hasn't done anything except open the bidding and raise South, and South has launched Blackwood without any further explorations.

 

Do you think South has a very strong hand?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with mike. From an admittedly limited selection I've seen more slams be let through on the 'brilliant' lead than beaten.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

[hv=n=skqjt2hq63dj63ca6&w=sh842dakq942c7542&e=s987654hdt75ct983&s=sa3hakjt975d8ckqj]399|300|[/hv]

 

This one is a true story and it was in the newspapers (according to Bill Root, who used this example in his classes), probably about 60 years ago. West thought the slam was making due to the strong bidding by South, and his having 9 HCP militated against his partner having anything. He reasoned that if partner had the Jack of , then he could get a ruff. However, he also figured, better lead a low one, as if dummy has the ten and partner the Jack, declarer may duck and partner may get cute and duck also.

 

So he led a low . Of course, his heart sank when he saw the Jack of in dummy. But wait ! Declarer got complacent and played low from dummy !!

 

When partner got over the shock of winning the first trick with the Ten, he realized that West was desparate to put him on lead, and seeing 11 between his hand and dummy, he did the right thing.

 

Declarer was according to Root a "well known expert" and his name was never mentioned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...