Jump to content

Evaluation of a singleton K


What card do you need to open 1 instead of 2?  

30 members have voted

  1. 1. What card do you need to open 1 instead of 2?

    • A
      11
    • K
      18
    • Q
      1
    • J
      0


Recommended Posts

[hv=d=s&v=n&s=s?t732hkdkq743c85]133|100|Scoring: MP[/hv]

 

Not vulnerable, you have the option between a 2-suited 2 and a 1 opener. What is the honor you need to open on the 1-level?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that this is much more a question of system rather than judgement.

 

Case in point: I can give a very specific answer for MOSCITO. (I would not make a constructive one-level opening holding QT732 in Spades because the hand has 4 slam points. A constructive opening with 5-5 (or 6-4) shape requires a minimum of 5 slam points. KT732 would be a perfectly legitimate opening.) However, this data point has little relationship to the decision to open this hand playing

 

SAYC

2/1 GF

Polish Club

Precision

Acol

etc

 

Personally, I would want to hold a minimum of

 

KT732 playing Precision

AT732 playing Acol or SAYC

 

In all of these cases, I'd like to have another Jack.

 

Playing 2/1 or Polish Club, I'd want a dead minimum of AJ732 (and I'm still not happy about my choice of openings)

 

I'll point out that this is the hand type where to Polish Wilkosz 2 did very well. Lots of folks playing traditional single suited preempts couldn't bear to pass a shapely 5-5 pattern, chose to open at the one level, and ended up cutting their own throat when partner played them for a legitimate opening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I evaluate the k as worth roughly 2 points. What I need to open depends on system. Playing standard, I want about 11 points to open a 5-5 pattern so would need the ace. In other methods I might open lighter.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jlall
mike is a bipolar opener, don't mind him.

 

Anyways, K for me.

Surprised I said king, I would normally say ace I think. Maybe I said this because it was white/white MP. Guess I'm bipolar too :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Notwithstanding the number of responses here, it seems rather impossible to answer this question.

 

You indicated that the partnership has the tool of a two-suited 2 opening. As I have no idea what the parameters are for that opening, or what 1...2 implies when you do not elect to open 2, I cannot tell what is the right opening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Notwithstanding the number of responses here, it seems rather impossible to answer this question.

 

You indicated that the partnership has the tool of a two-suited 2 opening. As I have no idea what the parameters are for that opening, or what 1...2 implies when you do not elect to open 2, I cannot tell what is the right opening.

I think the implication is clear, Ken. The COC (CoQ?) implies that when the hand is a 1S opener, you don't open it 2S. But you have a 2S preempt to fall back on on any hand less than a 1S opener, so you don't have to "stretch" to open. The choice is not between 1S and pass, but 1S and 2S.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...