TimG Posted July 12, 2007 Report Share Posted July 12, 2007 I don't think it is a stretch to bid: 1♠-2♦3♦-3♥3♠-4♠ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted July 12, 2007 Report Share Posted July 12, 2007 I'm surprised nobody suggesed somethign like this: EDIT: I was so surprised that reread the post and saw Mike had :), why don't you use the color suit symbols mike? 1♠-1NT*2♦*-3♦3♥-3♠4♠ 1NT forcing.2♦ 3+ I might very well bid 3NT instead of 3♥ hard to not be biased, but rest of the bidding is clear in my 2/1 style. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pbleighton Posted July 12, 2007 Report Share Posted July 12, 2007 In a weak NT system 1♠ 2D2NT 3♥3♠ 4♠ is a possible auction. But we might just raise 2NT to 3NT. I would certainly raise 2NT to 3NT. Peter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Limey_p Posted July 15, 2007 Report Share Posted July 15, 2007 Gerben's sequence is perfect. For me, opener's second round 2♠ would be just a "mark time" bid, could have substantial extra strength but nothing more descriptive to say. I don't raise pard's 2♦ unless I have four of them. AP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbforster Posted July 16, 2007 Report Share Posted July 16, 2007 I'm surprised nobody suggesed somethign like this: 1♠-1NT*2♦*-3♦3♥-3♠4♠ 1NT forcing.2♦ 3+ I would also think that start seems reasonable. 1♠ natural 5+1NT forcing2♦ 3+3♦ inviting3♥ showing a ♥ stopper and no ♣ stopper3♠ doubleton ♠, no ♣ stopper At this point since responder is limited to invitational values, you could even pass 3♠ I suppose. Might be a reasonable choice at MPs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.