jim420 Posted July 7, 2007 Report Share Posted July 7, 2007 With no previous agreement between pairs... [hv=d=n&v=n&n=s863hat9752da92c2&w=sj9752hj83dj73cj9&e=sakhq4dkq65cak865&s=sqt4hk6dt84cqt743]399|300|Scoring: IMPW N E S- 2♥ X 3♥3♠ P 4♣ PP 4♥ X PP P lead ♠A4♥xN-4[/hv] This hand started off with a preempt of 2♥, then... :) Comments on everyone's bidding welcome... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted July 7, 2007 Report Share Posted July 7, 2007 East's bids were fine. 10/10 South's raise to 3♥ is dubious, it breaks the law without any shortness and with lots of quacks. But it's almost "ok". 6/10 West's 3♠ sounds like an overbid, especially at white. Game is probably not missed. Anyhoo, I can live with 3♠. 7/10 North's reraise to 4♥ is totally insane and breaks every rule of partnership discipline and common sense in general. 0/100 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pbleighton Posted July 7, 2007 Report Share Posted July 7, 2007 East's bids were fine. 10/10 South's raise to 3♥ is dubious, it breaks the law without any shortness and with lots of quacks. But it's almost "ok". 6/10 West's 3♠ sounds like an overbid, especially at white. Game is probably not missed. Anyhoo, I can live with 3♠. 7/10 North's reraise to 4♥ is totally insane and breaks every rule of partnership discipline and common sense in general. 0/100 Agree, except that I have more sympathy for 3S, the 5th spade makes 3S an attractive overbid. The orignal 2H isn't everyone's style at unfavorable, but it's fine with me. Peter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimG Posted July 7, 2007 Report Share Posted July 7, 2007 What about West's pass over 4♣? Might the combination of 3♠ (showing values) and intervenor's DBL followed by a new suit create a force? Tim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillHiggin Posted July 7, 2007 Report Share Posted July 7, 2007 East's thoughts must run along the lines "I have only one suicidal partner and two suicidal opponents - the odds are in my favor". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwnn Posted July 7, 2007 Report Share Posted July 7, 2007 I think 4♣ shows values but is NF. After all, 3♠ only promised a good-ish hand for spades, not for minors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimG Posted July 7, 2007 Report Share Posted July 7, 2007 I think 4♣ shows values but is NF. After all, 3♠ only promised a good-ish hand for spades, not for minors. If doubler had something like AKx x KQxx AKQxx, wouldn't he want to explore slam, but not launch right into RKC? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han Posted July 7, 2007 Report Share Posted July 7, 2007 I think that 2H is horrible at these colors. I would also double 2H with the east hand. I think that 3H is a very bad idea at these colors. I don't like 3S at all. Pass by north is excellent. 4C looks reasonable with the east hand, I don't see any other options. Pass by south is excellent. West's pass is impossible. You cannot make a free 3S bid and then pass the forcing 4C. 4H by north is the worst call of the auction imo. Excellent double and passes by al players follow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han Posted July 7, 2007 Report Share Posted July 7, 2007 I think 4♣ shows values but is NF. After all, 3♠ only promised a good-ish hand for spades, not for minors. Here is a rule for you: if parter doubles, you make a free bid and partner bids a new suit, that's always forcing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted July 7, 2007 Report Share Posted July 7, 2007 On a scale where 10 is brilliant, 5 is barely acceptable and 0 is devoted partnership destruction: 2♥: I like undiciplined preempts but this goes a little too far. Let's give it a 5.Dbl: 103♥: A bad bid that works surprisingly often, especially if opps over-rate you. 6.3♠: An overbid, this is not MP. 4.Pass: 104♣: This is forcing, right? Just in case it isn't (and because Hamman's law may apply), 8.Pass: 10Pass: 4. This is difficult to rate since the issue here is not what to bid with this particular hand, but whether 4♣ is forcing.4♥: 0. He already overstated his O/D ratio by opening 2♥. Now he doesn't respect p's captaincy and besides he rescues opps when they seem to have a misunderstanding. If he isn't known to be an otherwise nice person, this bid earns a place on my enemies list.X: 10. Even if pass would have been forcing (which partner won't think now that he passed 4♣), X is outstanding.Pass: 10Pass: 8. There is a case for 4♠ but pass is probably better.Pass: 10. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted July 8, 2007 Report Share Posted July 8, 2007 Hi, given the vulnerability, I can live witheach bid until 4C.4C is forcing, i.e. partner should notpass, most likely he should bid 4Sas choice of game.4H is asking for it, did North listento the bidding or was he asleep, and East answered. Thats it. With kind regardsMarlowe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P_Marlowe Posted July 8, 2007 Report Share Posted July 8, 2007 <snip> deleted Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted July 8, 2007 Report Share Posted July 8, 2007 I disagree. South has no fit. Whether he has values is pretty much irelevant. Opposite a diciplined preempt, 3♥ rates to go for 500 against opps' game, sometimes 800. As it is, it goes for 500 against opps' partscore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hotShot Posted July 8, 2007 Report Share Posted July 8, 2007 Never rise your own preempt!Next to north 4♥ bid everything else looks like a small error. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han Posted July 8, 2007 Report Share Posted July 8, 2007 4♣: This is forcing, right? Just in case it isn't (and because Hamman's law may apply), 8. I disagree, I think 4C is the best bid (and forcing!) so it deserves a 10. 3NT is a horrible bid imo, partner almost certainly has 1-2 hearts at these colors and playing her for the ace or king is seriously against the odds. By the way, I believe it is usually called Hamman's rule, not Hamman's law. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted July 9, 2007 Report Share Posted July 9, 2007 4♣: This is forcing, right? Just in case it isn't (and because Hamman's law may apply), 8. I disagree, I think 4C is the best bid (and forcing!) so it deserves a 10. 3NT is a horrible bid imo, partner almost certainly has 1-2 hearts at these colors and playing her for the ace or king is seriously against the odds. By the way, I believe it is usually called Hamman's rule, not Hamman's law. Yes, I agree that 4♣ is the best bid. What I was trying to say was that there may be alternatives (much worse alternatives, but still alternatives), which is not the case for some of the other bids, such as E's double of the final 4♥ contract. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the hog Posted July 9, 2007 Report Share Posted July 9, 2007 I think that 2H is horrible at these colors. I would also double 2H with the east hand. I think that 3H is a very bad idea at these colors. I don't like 3S at all. Pass by north is excellent. 4C looks reasonable with the east hand, I don't see any other options. Pass by south is excellent. West's pass is impossible. You cannot make a free 3S bid and then pass the forcing 4C. 4H by north is the worst call of the auction imo. Excellent double and passes by al players follow. I agree with these comments wholeheartedly. It is not the vul that makes 2H horrible, but the fact that 1) The suit is not that great, 2) You have 3 card support for S if pd has them. 3) You have ok D support as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoTired Posted July 9, 2007 Report Share Posted July 9, 2007 2H - OK, 8 hcp + 6 card suit, wtp. I don't worry much about which 8 they areDbl - OK. Other option is 3N3H - aaa. slightly acceptable. I would not do it, but usually works out OK3S - TERRIBLE with only 3 jacks. Mandatory pass. If partner has a big hand, then partner will dbl again. No reason to bid.4C - Not the best. I would bid 4S, hoping partner has a good 5-card spade suit.4H - UNBELIEVABLE. You can drop the opps in 4 of a minor and you bid again? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts