Jump to content

Should 3NT have made?


Walddk

Recommended Posts

[hv=d=e&v=b&n=sk6hk1098dkq6c10975&w=s8543ha7532da532c&e=sqj9h4dj10984ckq82&s=sa1072hqj6d7caj643]399|300|Scoring: IMP

N: 3NT

Lead: D10[/hv]

This hand from yesterday's open teams final in Antalya is one of the most interesting I have seen for a long time. The Israeli NS pair arrived in 3NT after South had bid clubs and spades, North hearts via a transfer bid (1).

 

East led 10 to partner's ace and 3 came back to declarer's king. The Indian defenders must have had the agreement that you return middle of the remaining three. Anyway, the contract made, and the board was flat.

 

Should the contract have made after diamond to the ace and a diamond back?

 

Roland

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like East is squeezed on the run of the tricks, and that West cannot duck the hearts to prevent it because north can switch to clubs if this happens.

 

 

What I wonder is if playing for this line is best approach, I think at the table I would just play a heart to avoid too many undertricks and then realice I make it by luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Declarer won't succed if he sets up the clubs, thus he's got to set ut hearts. West is forced to take the first heart, else declarer with one trick in the bag can abandon the suit and play on clubs.

 

After winning the 1st west clears the 's. Declarer cashes his 's. East is forced to keep QJ9 and KQ, and thus has to part with a . If he unblocked twice earlier and now discards his last high , keeping his 4, there's an entry to west after east wins a or . West can then score the 5th as the setting trick (2's, 2's and a black trick).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely it's symmetrical. You can play on clubs instead - win the diamond and play a low club; East has to split or you switch to hearts; you clear clubs, win the third diamond and run clubs. East discards his heart, but when you now duck a spade they have 2 diamonds, a spade, a diamond to the 5 and the ace of hearts.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Should the contract have made after diamond to the ace and a diamond back?

 

No. Declarer can not set up both rounded suits if E keeps both honors and 2 's. Even if W can't get in, sooner or later Declarer has a problem as long as E saves the right cards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[hv=d=e&v=b&n=sk6h10dc10975&w=s8543h75d5c&e=sqj9hdj9ckq&s=sa107hdcaj64]399|300|Scoring: IMP

N: 3NT

Lead: D10[/hv]

This was the position before declarer played his last heart. East was caught to either unguard one of the black suits or toss a diamond winner. If he does, declarer can set up his 9th trick in clubs.

 

Most of us would routinely have followed with 4 when a diamond was returned at trick 2, and that would be the end of the defence. Throw all your high diamonds away and retain the precious 4, your lifeline to partner's 5 and the heart trick declarer reluctantly had to set up for him. Well spotted by fluffy, Harald and Frances.

 

At the other table the contract was a make at trick 1 when East led 4!

 

Give East 5 and West the 4 and there is nothing the defence can do. Did anyone say that spot cards are insignificant? More often than not they are, but here they are not.

 

The beauty of bridge!

 

Roland

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...