Arsen Posted June 24, 2007 Report Share Posted June 24, 2007 This topic may seem ridiculous but i feel its necessary to be sounded somewhere. I thought Forum is more suited rather than Abuse " I was told by one of the yellows that this is to be addressed to (CLUB)" but the one who is in question the manager of the club therefore seemed useless. On 24th of June I was removed from a tourney for asking opps for their system to which they would not reply except in private chat that "i should bid" to me after much delay. I was removed from the tourney for insisting that they announce. What is the policy for this when the TD spams that players must announce system at beginning of each and every round? I would appreciate opinions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sceptic Posted June 24, 2007 Report Share Posted June 24, 2007 I would kcik ass and send to abuse, abuse of power is as bad as abuse with words I doubt I would get very good odds on guessing which club Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1eyedjack Posted June 24, 2007 Report Share Posted June 24, 2007 It sounds like an unpleasant experience but I favour a regime in which BBO stands back entirely from the operation of PRIVATE clubs, and let them run themselves entirely in isolation of any BBO supervisory capacity. If you don't like it, just leave the private club. This is purely my personal opinion, mind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inquiry Posted June 24, 2007 Report Share Posted June 24, 2007 It sounds like an unpleasant experience but I favour a regime in which BBO stands back entirely from the operation of PRIVATE clubs, and let them run themselves entirely in isolation of any BBO supervisory capacity. If you don't like it, just leave the private club. This is purely my personal opinion, mind. I agree and disagree... THere are a very limited number of private clubs. If they behave wrong, they need to be "corrected." The problem described here, however, is more of a director issue than a private club one. I see this behavior by TDs everyday. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BebopKid Posted June 24, 2007 Report Share Posted June 24, 2007 TD's that don't follow their own Tournament rules should lose their ability to be TD's. Is that something BBO can regulate? I have also noticed that pairs that do not announce their system at round start, usually do not reply to questions. I would ask the TD to replace my opps. But try not to get too upset, there are many idiots out there; we can't fix them and shouldn't waste our time worrying about them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inquiry Posted June 25, 2007 Report Share Posted June 25, 2007 TD's that don't follow their own Tournament rules should lose their ability to be TD's. Is that something BBO can regulate? I have also noticed that pairs that do not announce their system at round start, usually do not reply to questions. I would ask the TD to replace my opps. But try not to get too upset, there are many idiots out there; we can't fix them and shouldn't waste our time worrying about them. BBO is quick to give TD rights to someone wanting to run free tournaments. All they need is BBO experience (some number of months/log ins/hands played) and a CLEAN record with abuse. TD experience is not a requirement. BBO is also quick in pulling TD rights from a TD who abuses being a director. However, the abuse has to be pretty obvious. TD get to set up their rules as long as they advertise them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jillybean Posted June 25, 2007 Report Share Posted June 25, 2007 I think this demand to ‘announce your system and carding at the start of each round’ is a little absurd. Many partnerships in tournaments are casual, selected from the partnership desk. By comparison, regular pairs playing systems that are more complex are usually very good at announcing their methods. I see no benefit in making everyone give a cursory explanation of ‘sayc, std carding’ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arsen Posted June 25, 2007 Author Report Share Posted June 25, 2007 I agree with Jill that as it was really little absurd however my point is not "announcing or not announcing" I was removed from tourney just because I wanted to "follow" the RULES of that particular tourney that have been "spammed" on each and every round repeatedly. Your interest appreciated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jillybean Posted June 25, 2007 Report Share Posted June 25, 2007 Arsen you have my sympathy there, its crazy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerben42 Posted June 25, 2007 Report Share Posted June 25, 2007 Even with a pickup partner for a tournament you will have to decide on system and carding, so I think it is very reasonable as a service to your opponents (Full disclosure!) to announce what you have agreed. Even though in the USA people will play "sayc, std. carding" in many countries what you call standard is non-standard or even alertable. Just a simple thing, a 2♣ opening. In the USA it is standard that this is the strongest opening bid, in France it is any SemiGF. In Poland it shows an intermediate hand in Clubs. All by a simple agreement of "standard national system, pd?"... P.S. I think you were incorrectly removed from the tourney. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tammyd47 Posted June 29, 2007 Report Share Posted June 29, 2007 As a TD myself, I know how important it is to set rules that you plan to enforce. Enforcement should apply to all players regardless of status (e.g. yellow, star, expert, beginner, personal friend, etc.) When a player asks his/her opponents to comply with the rules and they refuse to do so, then the TD has no other alternative than to come to the table ande give offending player (s) an opportunity to comply. If they still refuse, then THEY should be removed, not the player that requested compliance. The notion that a TD of a "private club" can bend his/her own rules doesn't make sense. Rules are rules to be followed by all members of the tourney. Obviously, not all players follow the rules. Usually this doesn't matter unless their opponents request them to. Then all bets are off and compliance should be mandatory. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.