kenrexford Posted June 22, 2007 Report Share Posted June 22, 2007 ♠Axx ♥Axx ♦J10x ♣KQ10x You open 1NT. Your agreement (not allowed to change it) is that a 1NT opening shows anything from a 14-HCP hand with five controls (minimum) to a 17-HCP hand with no five-card suit and less than five controls (maximum). LHO overcalls 3♠ favorable. Partner doubles, which shows stuff. Values with no clear direction. Sit or bid? If bid, what? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jlall Posted June 22, 2007 Report Share Posted June 22, 2007 I'd go 3N. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foo Posted June 22, 2007 Report Share Posted June 22, 2007 "values w/ no clear direction." sounds like 3-♥, no ♠ stop, and GF values. What would pd do w/ 55 in the minors and GF? Especially if this bid exists and pd did not use it, 3N looks right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fluffy Posted June 22, 2007 Report Share Posted June 22, 2007 3NT as well Axx is good stopper for a pre Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skjaeran Posted June 22, 2007 Report Share Posted June 22, 2007 3NT. Should have possibilities. Converting isn't attractive at any form of scoring. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmunte1 Posted June 22, 2007 Report Share Posted June 22, 2007 3NT. I would never pass 3♠ doubled with that hand Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helene_t Posted June 22, 2007 Report Share Posted June 22, 2007 Pass, but I feel uncomfortable with the meaning of the double and it quite possible that some knowledge about my p's doubling tendencies would make me bid 3N. I realize that a more stringent definition of the double would leave many hands unbiddable, but I still prefer some clarification. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted June 22, 2007 Report Share Posted June 22, 2007 Pard has no clear direction, eh? Well, I got no clear direction either, so I pass :) :) :) I'm assuming pard knows what he's doing (else 3NT=obvious..lol). But then again, to play take-out dbls after 1NT already shows pard has a least a bit of a clue.. :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apollo81 Posted June 22, 2007 Report Share Posted June 22, 2007 3NT. Not close to any other call IMO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.