Jump to content

Advancing (or not) a takeout double (free)


kenrexford

What would you do?  

38 members have voted

  1. 1. What would you do?

    • pass
      0
    • double
      1
    • One Spade
      28
    • Two Spades
      8
    • Three Spades
      1
    • Four Spades
      0
    • Two Diamonds
      0
    • Two Hearts
      0
    • Two Clubs
      0
    • 1NT
      0
    • 2NT
      0
    • 3NT
      0
    • Three Hearts
      0
    • Four Hearts
      0
    • Other
      0


Recommended Posts

I voted 2 which is what I prefer to bid, but with an unknwon p probably 1 is safer.

 

With a flat 11-point with four spades I bid 2.

 

X is pointless with a hand with a clear direction. It is also very dangerous since most partners would pass it with an normal t/o double (three-card hearts) and everybody will pass with a 4-card hearts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Had I bid 3, as I learned it, this would ask partner to bid 4 unless he has a good reason to not bid 4, essentially. But, 2 is a pure expectancy bid, somewhat "preemptive" in effect but "descriptive" in purpose.

I prefer that these two bids be reversed.

 

So that 2S shows a good hand inviting 4S, and 3S is purely preemptive.

 

After all, bidding 1S does nothing to preclude a 2H call (or a support X), and 2S doesn't gain much in that department either.

 

We are short in hearts, and we do have a presupposed double fit (clubs, spades). I dont expect 3S to be damaged that badly, should the opponents decide to defend (and they are correct).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are short in hearts, and we do have a presupposed double fit (clubs, spades).  I dont expect 3S to be damaged that badly, should the opponents decide to defend (and they are correct).

And if you don't expect 3S to be damaged that badly vulnerable...

 

Come to the Dark side, young Jedi....

 

 

P.S. We had a similar auction yesterday, I jumped to game with junk like this, LHO bid 5 or whatever the equivalent was, and partner brought down the hammer. +1100. I'd probably be smarter if the opponents would stop rewarding my stupidity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...