Jump to content

Worth one more?


MickyB

Recommended Posts

Worth one more? I am thinking about trying for slam, I would neve consider pass.

 

Look your partner opened second seat a preempt. These should be "sound" preempts under whatever range of preempts you play. Second, you ARE VUL and they are not at imps. He really should have a fair shot for 9 tricks in his hand. Your spade queen was enough to raise to game. You have an additional ACE and king. Slam should have some chance if they can not cash two quick tricks in hearts or two aces. I expect the two ACE problem will be our downfall for slam, so I would bid 4, but change my club King to club ACE, and I cue-bid 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sure, why not?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Worth one more? I am thinking about trying for slam, I would neve consider pass.

 

Look your partner opened second seat a preempt. These should be "sound" preempts under whatever range of preempts you play. Second, you ARE VUL and they are not at imps. He really should have a fair shot for 9 tricks in his hand. Your spade queen was enough to raise to game. You have an additional ACE and king. Slam should have some chance if they can not cash two quick tricks in hearts or two aces. I expect the two ACE problem will be our downfall for slam, so I would bid 4, but change my club King to club ACE, and I cue-bid 4.

This is not serious, you are not thinking in slam!!

 

4 is ok. If you win slam in this hand is because partner have to open 1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jlall
This is not so clear at all, it would really depend on who my partner was. I wouldn't be so shocked if pass was the long term winner opposite partners who are not inquiry :) I would probably kick it in opposite sound partners though.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where's mike777 to partner Ben: to expect a play for 9 tricks in his own hand for 3???? Wow, what would a 4 opening bid show?

 

I am with Justin... with at least two of my partners, game rates to be below even the red-at-imps odds, but with others, it rates to be about 40-50%. I'd go opposite them... heck, I'd probably go anyway, since some of the time that game fails, it goes down 2 (hence 3 fails as well). And, one thing is known: we are not going to get doubled :P

 

BTW, no partner of mine would hold, as an example, AKxxxxx x Kxx xx.. that's a 1 bid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where's mike777 to partner Ben: to expect a play for 9 tricks in his own hand for 3???? Wow, what would a 4 opening bid show?

 

I am with Justin... with at least two of my partners, game rates to be below even the red-at-imps odds, but with others, it rates to be about 40-50%. I'd go opposite them... heck, I'd probably go anyway, since some of the time that game fails, it goes down 2 (hence 3 fails as well). And, one thing is known: we are not going to get doubled :P

 

BTW, no partner of mine would hold, as an example, AKxxxxx x Kxx xx.. that's a 1 bid.

Well before all of you rip me a new one, let me remind you.

 

1- This is imps, not matchpoints

2- We are 2nd seat not first

3- We are vulnerable and they are not

 

I expect to be no more than one down under these circumstances for a "preempt". If you don't play SOUND PREEMPTS at this type of contest under these conditions then you never will.

 

And for the record, I am know for preempting in as few as four card suits under other conditions. Richard got very angry at me once for a four card preempt with him (not vul versus vul at matchpoints). Normally I usually have at least five cards at those condtions. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[hv=d=w&v=n&n=sat987xxhxxxdkxxc&s=sqjxhjt8da87xckt9]133|200|Scoring: IMP

I passed 3, LHO doubled and RHO bid 4, which drifted one off with only 8 tricks available in spades. Glad to see my actions had some support![/hv]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[hv=d=w&v=n&n=sat987xxhxxxdkxxc&s=sqjxhjt8da87xckt9]133|200|Scoring: IMP

I passed 3, LHO doubled and RHO bid 4, which drifted one off with only 8 tricks available in spades. Glad to see my actions had some support![/hv]

Maybe you should have told us, that is was you young spirit who opened 3 Spade. Opposite a junior I had hoped that we will scrambvle 7 tricks with my hand as dummy somehow and that we won´t get hammered.

 

With some cowards like me, your hand is not even close to something that looks like a weak three bid in second seat vul against not. But this is just a matter of style.

I had openend this hand 3 Spade on this colours in 1. or 3. seat or nv in second, but never in the position you gave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll bid 4 for more reasons:

 

-It may make or go down one, and tghough it could be an under 50% contract, bidding the game at this vulnerabilities is a 36.5%+ affair

-Opponents may reopen and find an making game (4 for example)

-Opponents may make a phantom sacrifice, especially at this vulnerabilities

Link to comment
Share on other sites

-It may make or go down one, and tghough it could be an under 50% contract, bidding the game at this vulnerabilities is a 36.5%+ affair

Hey, long time since our last debate about those percentages!.

 

I kno I said this before, but still: vulnerable games that make 36% of the time get doubled for -800 and you don't lose 6 IMPs, you lose 12 IMPs, that maths are not right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...