gwnn Posted May 7, 2007 Report Share Posted May 7, 2007 Pd and I agreed 1M-2M to show 5+oM+5+♣, at most 6 loser hand. What do you reckon the best structure would be after (1M)-2M-p-2NT? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pclayton Posted May 7, 2007 Report Share Posted May 7, 2007 If you are playing tops and bottoms; 2N functions better as some sort of specific ask, or even natural. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenrexford Posted May 8, 2007 Report Share Posted May 8, 2007 3♦ as agreeing the major and asking seems obvious. With a minimum, partner signs off. With better, partner cues or shows shape. If 2NT is not natural (my choice would be natural -- use 3OM as club-focused asking bid), then it should logically agree clubs, with 3♣ a minimum and anything else extras, again cuebids, but expected to be notrump-centered while below and unless bypassing 3NT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.