ppek Posted April 6, 2007 Report Share Posted April 6, 2007 Hi all, I am trying to design system based on Magic Diamond structure and actualy I am stucked in 1D structure. The original structure after 1H negative (0-7 any hand) is to complex. I am looking for structure that could be conventional but not relays and prefer as naturalish as possible continuations. Any experiences or suggestions? RegardsPavel Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerben42 Posted April 6, 2007 Report Share Posted April 6, 2007 1♠ as second positive, rest natural is simplest but not optimal. I guess better would be reverse the majors and the minors, i.e. 2♣ = 4+♥2♦ = 4+♠ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Posted April 6, 2007 Report Share Posted April 6, 2007 I'd suggest the following: After 1♦-?1♥ = semipositive (5-7 or so)1♠ = double negative1NT+ = GF, whatever structure you use After 1♦-1♥-?1♠ = relay, GF (opener responds 1NT+, the structure you use for initial GF hands, so no extra memory load here)Other bids natural and not GF After 1♦-1♠-?Whatever you prefer after double negatives. I like 2♣ as strong and rest canapé transfers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hrothgar Posted April 6, 2007 Report Share Posted April 6, 2007 Hi There Back in the day, when I was playing arround with Magic Diamond, I found it easiest to adopt control showing response like the ones used in old style Blue Team Club. I don't claim that this structure was in any way optimal, however, it did have the benefit of being very simple. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickToll Posted April 6, 2007 Report Share Posted April 6, 2007 Years ago, I used to play a strong diamond system (17+). My partner and I had a very simple development over 1♦: 1♦ - 1♥: negative or super-positive (14+); I think super-positive can be be dropped without any serious loss1♦ - 1♠: 8-13, GF unbalanced; here, opener's 1NT suggests no special suit1♦ - 1NT: 8-13, GF balanced; here, opener's 2NT shows a balanced hand with one or both four-card majors or slam interest1♦ - 2suit: 5-7, fair 6card suit 1♦ - 1♥ - 1♠: 17-20, unbalanced, no good suit, typically a 5.41♦ - 1♥ - 1NT: 17-20, balanced1♦ - 1♥ - 2suit: 17+, natural, 1RF; if minimum, good suit1♦ - 1♥ - 2NT: 21-23, balanced (with 24+, rebid 2♣ over 1♥, then 2NT)1♦ - 1♥ - 3suit: 21+, 3suiter, shortness in the same ranking suit (e.g., 3♣ = short diamonds) 1♦ - 1♥ - 1♠ - 1NT: double negative1♦ - 1♥ - 1♠ - 2suit: 5-7, natural, even a four-card suit1♦ - 1♥ - 1♠ - 2NT+: super-positive, natural 1♦ - 1♥ - 1NT: your favourite notrump system will do fine 1♦ - 1♥ - 2suit - 1st step: double negative; here opener's suit rebid is not forcing, a new suit is forcing one round1♦ - 1♥ - 2suit - others: natural and at least semi-positive; a new suit can be bid with four cards only1♦ - 1♥ - 2suit - 2NT: four or more cards in the 1st step suit, at least semi-positive Very, very simple and natural, with a reasonable chance to find the best fit within the three level (we used Italian cue-bids in the slam auctions). Surely not the most efficient development after 1♦, but with a good results-to-effort ratio... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.