Jump to content

To force or not to force?


42

Which bid do you choose?  

26 members have voted

  1. 1. Which bid do you choose?

    • 2[HE]
      3
    • 2[SP]
      17
    • 2NT
      1
    • 3[DI]
      1
    • 3[HE]
      0
    • 3NT
      2
    • 4[DI]
      1
    • 5[DI]
      1
    • other
      0


Recommended Posts

Hmm, that 7 is a real bugger. Don't know what to do, now :)

I want to force. I know partner could be flat broke but also he might not raise a game try when it is right. 2 is strong but NF for me, and 3 overstates the Hearts, so it is down to some number of NT. I went for 3, and hope I don't get a lead. I expect the majority vote will be 2NT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Justin, what do you expect partner to bid after 2?

NT is out, he won't bid 3 cards of , so the most likely bid will be 3 or 3, or? And then? Going for s then? Raise s?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jlall
Justin, what do you expect partner to bid after 2?

NT is out, he won't bid 3 cards of , so the most likely bid will be 3 or 3, or? And then? Going for s then? Raise s?

He can bid whatever, I will probably end up in 5D but we might end up in hearts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[hv=d=n&v=b&s=saqxhaj7xxdaqxxca]133|100|Scoring: IMP

pass (1) DBL (pass)

2 (pass) ?[/hv]

 

What are your thoughts and hopes?

2s no problem yet.

 

I may very well miss slam here, as usual after rho opens at one level in second seat. If partner opens on junk in first seat even more likely to miss slam.

 

If I x and then cue and then bid a new suit at 3 level, I think this shows more than a minumum hand. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no need to rush to game. So 2 Spade is it. If Pd will bid something strong like a jump or 3 Spade, I am in Slam within nanoseconds.

Of course more likely he will bid something weak. If this bid is 3 Club, I will show my support with 3 Diamond. If he bids 3 Diamonds himself I would bid 3 NT and hope that he gets the message.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[hv=d=n&v=b&n=s109xhdj987xxc9xxx&s=saqxhaj7xxdaqxxca]133|200|Scoring: IMP[/hv]

 

Lead: 8.

 

After a long thought I chickenlike decided to bid 2 (my second choice would have been 2, third choice 3NT) which became the final contract. Due to a bad defence I made the contract :lol: The K was a singleton and therefore the slam in was cold, also immediately analyzed by opps.

I knew that my bid was nonforcing, but with such a weak 6card -suit I would have been bidding 3 with the N hand because it is completely worthless in a -contract, imo. Hit me, please ;)

 

Would anyone bid the -slam?? I think it isn't biddable, but who am I?

 

 

@Jillybean: I only mentioned the 7 to underline the bad quality of the -suit.

And I like 7s, not as much as 42s, but still... Best is 7 and to make the last trick with it for a beer or 2 :) :-*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you still get a beer if the Diamond 7 is in the trump suit?

In Australia you do B)

 

2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OT: Making the last trick with 7 in the trump suit is worth 2 beers B)

 

Back to this hand:

I wonder which contract would be reached when it could be opened in first seat.

Does anyone open 2??

I think I would open 2NT, but then it is not clear how the bidding proceeds, since 3 ist (puppet-)stayman. Will partner bid game with his 6th J?

 

Yes, Winston, I saw also that we will have some problems after 2 where the strong hand is still undescribed according to distribution. But it seems that I am very lonely with my pessimistic view... And as the cards lie, the optimists are right :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, Winston, I saw also that we will have some problems after 2♠ where the strong hand is still undescribed according to distribution. But it seems that I am very lonely with my pessimistic view... And as the cards lie, the optimists are right 

 

This sequence comes up now and again so it is wise to have some type agreement in place - my personal thinking is that this double-then-cue should be considered a "request for further clarification". How to continue from there is up for grabs.

2NT could be used to deny much shape or interest, but loses a natural encouraging meaning, although I think this loss not overly substantial and it leaves a rebid to show length and weakness. (2N would be a handy 'bad hand/bad shape' bid if you were forced to bid a 3-card minor.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would bid 2. There's no rule against pard having 3 hearts, is there? :) With his actual hand, pard should probably insist on diams with 3.

 

Why not passing 2? Simple: if doubler had a really cool heart 1-suiter, he would have rebid 3 instead of 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...