Jump to content

2-part question


han

Recommended Posts

I thought about this hand and I wondered if the following construction was possible:

 

QJTxxx

AQx

AKQ

A

 

Tough to know how this hand is supposed to bid.

This construction I don't agree with. 3 loser hands don't make grand slam tries after a 2 opener.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This construction I don't agree with. 3 loser hands don't make grand slam tries after a 2 opener.

I'm not saying I disagree with you. Or namely, that the hand above would make a grand slam try. My goal was to try to construct a hand consistent with the bidding where 7 wouldn't make.

 

I did find your comment amusing though in that the last time I checked:

 

AQJxxx AQxx KQx A

 

is a 3 loser hand. :)

 

The difference being which A you require partner to have in addition to his major suit kings: diamonds or spades?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This construction I don't agree with. 3 loser hands don't make grand slam tries after a 2 opener.

I'm not saying I disagree with you. Or namely, that the hand above would make a grand slam try. My goal was to try to construct a hand consistent with the bidding where 7 wouldn't make.

 

I did find your comment amusing though in that the last time I checked:

 

AQJxxx AQxx KQx A

 

is a 3 loser hand. :P

 

The difference being which A you require partner to have in addition to his major suit kings: diamonds or spades?

Yeah; didn't notice that; touche! :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is the full hand plus bidding:

 

[hv=d=w&v=n&n=s973h107daj763c863&w=saqj642haq3dkq9ca&e=sk1085hk6542d4c1092&s=shj98d10852ckqj754]399|300|Scoring: IMP

2C-p-2D-3C

3S-4C-5S-p

6H-p-6S-all pass[/hv]

 

This is probably an interesting auction for experienced partnerships, and with Josh (with whom I think I've played only a couple of times) I really had to guess the meaning of 6H. Obviously we had no club losers, and I thought it was likely that he was missed first round diamond control.

 

The discussion suggests that Josh overbid, that he shouldn't be looking for three useful cards (spade king, heart king and diamond ace). However, if he really had AQJxxx AQJ AKQx -, maybe he should just bid the grand? I need to have more than 1 useful card for the jump to 5S.

 

It is "standard" to cuebid 1st round controls up-the-line at this level. Maybe it is superior to play the structure that mikeh suggests, but without discussion isn't it normal to expect partner to miss the diamond ace in this auction?

 

Further comments are appreciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well done for being on the same wavelength, but I have to confess I don't understand why Josh would not bid 6.

 

He is missing so much that even possession of the A is not enough... I'd expect (assuming partner held the A):

 

6 6 6 would be the 'normal' way to try for grand with that 'horrible' hand... it is, after all, a minimum on the auction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...