xx1943 Posted February 15, 2007 Report Share Posted February 15, 2007 Hi all do you have a good bidding-system, if opponents play the 2 NT-opening as unusual (preempt with 55 in minors)? Thanks for your replies Al Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Echognome Posted February 15, 2007 Report Share Posted February 15, 2007 Seems to me using unusual over unusual is a good start. I'd add the jump cuebids as follows as well. (2NT) - ? Dbl Penalty of one or both minors3♣ Good hand with ♥ better than ♠3♦ Good hand with ♠ better than ♥3♥ Natural competitive3♠ Natural competitive3NT To play4♣ Good 4M bid4♦ 55 Majors Good hand4♥/♠ To play Alternative is to distinguish between both majors hands with 4♣ and 4♦. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whereagles Posted February 15, 2007 Report Share Posted February 15, 2007 LOL.. I thought this was methods to show a 55 over a 20-22 2NT :) In which case I was just about to propose dont, eheh. As it is, Echo's scheme is good. A 2NT for the minors is pretty easy to defend. A 2NT as pree in any suit is a whole different ball game :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pclayton Posted February 15, 2007 Report Share Posted February 15, 2007 Seems to me using unusual over unusual is a good start. I'd add the jump cuebids as follows as well. (2NT) - ? Dbl Penalty of one or both minors3♣ Good hand with ♥ better than ♠3♦ Good hand with ♠ better than ♥3♥ Natural competitive3♠ Natural competitive3NT To play4♣ Good 4M bid4♦ 55 Majors Good hand4♥/♠ To play Alternative is to distinguish between both majors hands with 4♣ and 4♦. This is basically what I play, although we haven't defined jump cue bids. I think they'd be better used as splitting the single suited hand that wants to bid 4M however. By the way, an Unusual 2N is not at all easy to defend. You start your bidding at the 3 level. Its a world away from an Unusual 2N overcall. I play this in most of my partnerships, especially where Multi is allowed, and I can add in one of the big balanced hands. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcD Posted February 15, 2007 Report Share Posted February 15, 2007 Seems to me using unusual over unusual is a good start. I'd add the jump cuebids as follows as well. (2NT) - ? Dbl Penalty of one or both minors3♣ Good hand with ♥ better than ♠3♦ Good hand with ♠ better than ♥3♥ Natural competitive3♠ Natural competitive3NT To play4♣ Good 4M bid4♦ 55 Majors Good hand4♥/♠ To play Alternative is to distinguish between both majors hands with 4♣ and 4♦. Play the same except dbl shows values (13+ balanced). No need to warn them we have a penalty double in a minor : just pass and then double. Value showing double enables partner to better judge the situation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtfanclub Posted February 15, 2007 Report Share Posted February 15, 2007 Play the same except dbl shows values (13+ balanced). No need to warn them we have a penalty double in a minor : just pass and then double. Value showing double enables partner to better judge the situation Don't assume you'll get another chance to bid...one of the nice things about using 2NT is that partner can pass it, either when he thinks it's the right contract or he thinks anything undoubled is better than anything doubled. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fred Posted February 15, 2007 Report Share Posted February 15, 2007 2 other reasonable approaches can be developed based on: - 3C=good hand with both majors- 3D=lesser hand with both majors or: - 3C=both majors- 3D=hearts- 3H=spades Fred GitelmanBridge Base Inc.www.bridgebase.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hrothgar Posted February 15, 2007 Report Share Posted February 15, 2007 2 other reasonable approaches can be developed based on: - 3C=good hand with both majors- 3D=lesser hand with both majors or: - 3C=both majors- 3D=hearts- 3H=spades Fred GitelmanBridge Base Inc.www.bridgebase.com The following might be a slight improvement on the methods that Fred suggests (If you're going to show a weak hand with both majors, you might as well do so by bidding 3♥ rather than 3♦) X = Various strong hand types3♣ = Good hand with both majors3♦ = Hearts (not sure if it would be better to treat this as an x-fer or a puppet)3♥ = Competitive hand with both majors3♠ = Spades Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JanM Posted February 16, 2007 Report Share Posted February 16, 2007 We use a method similar to Echo's, but show relative lengths of the Majors, not which is "better" because we'd like to play in our longer combined suit. So: DBL: 14+ probably balanced or 18+ one-suited Major3♣: 5+ hearts, 4+ spades (now 3♦ is available to ask for a 5 card spade suit)3♦: exactly 4 hearts, 5 or 6 spades3M: Natural NF3NT: To play (tricks)4♣: 6+ hearts, 4+ spades, always a 2 card discrepancy, good enough to force to game4♦: Ditto, but longer spades4M Natural NF Although the 4m bids aren't terribly useful, we haven't found anything more useful (with the very good 1-suiter in a Major, we DBL and then bid the Major) and this is a defense you can't look at at the table, so it's best to keep it reasonably simple. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
han Posted February 16, 2007 Report Share Posted February 16, 2007 I'm 100% sure Echo meant "longer" when he said "better". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcD Posted February 16, 2007 Report Share Posted February 16, 2007 Play the same except dbl shows values (13+ balanced). No need to warn them we have a penalty double in a minor : just pass and then double. Value showing double enables partner to better judge the situation Don't assume you'll get another chance to bid...one of the nice things about using 2NT is that partner can pass it, either when he thinks it's the right contract or he thinks anything undoubled is better than anything doubled. I see your point but people in Europe who use it (mostly poles of course) tend to use it with decent hands and double seems more useful as shwing values than pure penalty. Also if 2NT gets passed partner will do its outmost to balance with double Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dake50 Posted February 16, 2007 Report Share Posted February 16, 2007 3-level xfers - guaratees a second chance which may be pass, but allows 2 messages low; X penalty seeking. Pass - waiting to see them in trouble. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.