Jump to content

Partner bids 2S


kgr

Recommended Posts

[hv=d=e&s=saxxhxxxxdkxxckqx]133|100|Scoring: MP[/hv]

Bidding starting with East (RHO):

(1H)-p-(2H)-2S

(3H)-???

Opps play a standard 5-car M system.

DBL by you is still take-out oriented, but doesn't really show a fit.

If you DBL, should partner always bid 3S with a minimal hand.

What do you consider miinimum to bid 2S at MP's?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 possibilities

1) just bid 4 spades. Partner has at most 1 heart, so you are playing with a 30 point deck (not to be confused with "not playing with a full deck").

 

2) HOWEVER, if it part of the partnership agreement that partner is permitted to bid 2 with a hand that is less than an opening bid, such as whereagles' example, then (provided that we have discussed this) IMO a 3 bid might be used as a game try in spades (not asking for a heart stopper- this hand didn't bid over the 1H opener). Just be sure the partnership has discussed what the 2S bidder needs to accept the game try. Even so, with my kings including my KQ located behind the 1 opener, I'm not so sure that I don't want to be in 4S even opposite that sample hand. However, if wrong, I want to be wrong in favor of obtaining a plus score on the hand.

 

So, if discussed, IMO, 3 seems like a good bid. I'm not clear what a simple raise to 3 would mean...(competitive?)

 

DHL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thought this was more intersting hand then the 7-4 post and hoped for more answers here. Let me rephrase my questions.

(1H)-P-(2H)-2S

(3H)-??

Questions: (difficult at MP's I think)

- What is minimum hand for the 2S bid?

- If DBL is takeout: What should DBL mean/ask here and should 2S bidder with a minimum hand and a 4-card m bid 3S or 4m?

- Is 3S competitive or invitational?

 

Thanks,

Koen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[hv=d=e&s=saxxhxxxxdkxxckqx]133|100|Scoring: MP[/hv]

Bidding starting with East (RHO):

(1H)-p-(2H)-2S

(3H)-???

Opps play a standard 5-car M system.

DBL by you is still take-out oriented, but doesn't really show a fit.

If you DBL, should partner always bid 3S with a minimal hand.

What do you consider miinimum to bid 2S at MP's?

The problem, such as it is, is not what the opponents play so much as does your partner subscribe to the theory of OBAR (opponents bid and raise). According to this theory, your partner will bid anytime he has the right distribution as a "pre-balance".

 

If the opponents ahve huge fit and values for game, his bid makes littel difference, they will simply bid game. If instead you have points, you may not have the hand to "balance" with. (as this 3-4-3-3 shows).

 

If you do not play OBAR, forcing to game is clear cut, and in fact, you may well have a slam. If you do play OBAR your partner may have already bid everyone of your points and managed to push them to 3 rather than let them rest peacefully in 2.

 

Playing OBAR, I would think a minimum for a frisky partner, not vul, might be something like... KQTxx x xxx xxxx.

 

At MP, if we were VUL, I think I would bid 4 figuring partner would not risk bidding crazy where -200 for us could be death. If we were not vul, I would consider both pass and 3. I maybe the only one considering pass. IF opponents play "constructive" raises, I think I would pass if they were vulnerable. If partner has something, we might set them two when we can't make 4, and if he doesn't we don't we might go down a couple doubled. If they are not vul, I would bid 3. The reason being, they might take the push to 4 over 3 and WEST is more likely to be pushing with 3 at t this vulnerability. IF they don't promise "good values" for 2 raise, I would compete to 3 with some reaonsable worries.

 

If we do not play OBAR, I will bid 4 over 3 as a mild slam try.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A guide to winning at MP...

 

After 1H p 2H ?

 

1) look for heart shortness.

2) bid.

3) win.

 

Seriously these hands are so frequent and so critical at MP that I believe if your style does not allow you to bid with a wide range of hands you are playing a losing style. I thought larry cohen had taught us this before. The purpose of your life should be to get them out of 2H/2S.

 

Ben gave a great example hand:

 

♠KQTxx ♥x ♦xxx ♣xxxx
. I would be shocked if the few guys who do consistently well in national pair games ie berk/cohen, zia, katz, etc did not bid with this hand. Not only does it take them out of 2H but it gets your lead director in as well (the other thing that is very important in MP). I believe not bidding with this hand would be a serious error.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Justin stole my thunder...at MPs in this auction 2S shows nothing more than a fairly good suit. KQ9xx, x, xxxx, xxx would be fine.

 

With that said, I think that using double as you do is not the best of methods - it might be better to use 3S as competitive and double as showing values worth a game try - after all, you're really not going to be trying to uncover a whole new minor-suit fit at the 4-level in this auction, so why waste the bid that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...