Jump to content

Flannery and reversed flannery responses


Free

Recommended Posts

Lately I've seen several pairs play "flannery responses" or "reversed flannery responses" after 1m openings. I was wondering what the main advantages are, why they seem necessary or useful, and how you fill up the extra space, since you don't have weak and invite hands with 5-4M anymore. Anyone care to explain plz?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The main reason to use some form of flannery response is to avoid the nightmare sequence : 1D 1S 2D where 2H would be forcing and you might have a heart fit or even game (especially in european systems where the 2H reverse is fairly strong). The idea was extended to the 1C opening ; not sure this is as useful but it does fit nicely if you choose to bypass sapdes over 1C 1H with balanced hands (and avoids some problems when 4th hand overcalls). You loose weak twos in response to 1m but this may actually be an asset rather than a liability
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While we have a RFR thread.. if  you play RFR, how do you play...

 

1m-2?

 

Is this 2 preemptive with spades, invitational with a RFR type hand (5, 4+), GF with a RFR type hand, forcing with , or something else?

Had this exact discussion yesterday/ My favorite meaning is a mixed raise of the minor. This adds a lot of clarity to the 1 minor - 3 minor sequence.

 

At Dallas last year though, several pairs had a multiple meaning for 2 though (midchart).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...